Literature DB >> 8545261

Culture and psychiatric diagnosis. Impact on DSM-IV and ICD-10.

R D Alarcon1.   

Abstract

Psychiatric diagnosis is a clinical activity subjected to more clinical determinants than many others. Based on a unique human encounter, it resorts to a variety of informational sources and interpretive mechanisms that reflect strong cultural biases. Each diagnostic system has mirrored the period of history in which it became established. This article examines the effect of culture on the two best-known diagnostic and classificatory systems: the DSM-IV and the ICD-10 Section V. It is important to minimize the ethnocentrism of disease categories in psychiatry and to highlight sources of possible cultural biases in the diagnostic interview and the diagnostic process in general, including assessment of comorbidity levels of stress, multiaxial impairment, everyday functioning, and management recommendations. Research on these issues and on diagnostic and measurement instruments must be pursued without sacrificing mainstream conventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8545261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Clin North Am        ISSN: 0193-953X


  11 in total

1.  The cultural formulation: a method for assessing cultural factors affecting the clinical encounter.

Authors:  Roberto Lewis-Fernández; Naelys Díaz
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2002

2.  Broadening the international base for the development of an integrated diagnostic system in psychiatry.

Authors:  Carlos E Berganza
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  Cultural formulation with attention to language and cultural dynamics in a mexican psychiatric patient treated in San Diego, California.

Authors:  Jesús A Bucardo; Thomas L Patterson; Dilip V Jeste
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2008-03

4.  Cultural formulation of psychiatric diagnosis.

Authors:  R Lewis-Fernández
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  1996-06

5.  Psychiatric diagnosis of African Americans: diagnostic divergence in clinician-structured and semistructured interviewing conditions.

Authors:  H W Neighbors; S J Trierweiler; C Munday; E E Thompson; J S Jackson; V J Binion; J Gomez
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  A comparative study of diagnostic practice in psychiatry in Northern Norway and Northwest Russia.

Authors:  Grigory Rezvyy; Terje Oiesvold; Alexandr Parniakov; Reidun Olstad
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.328

7.  Diagnostic validity across racial and ethnic groups in the assessment of adolescent DSM-IV disorders.

Authors:  Jennifer Greif Green; Michael J Gruber; Ronald C Kessler; Julia Y Lin; Katie A McLaughlin; Nancy A Sampson; Alan M Zaslavsky; Margarita Alegria
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 4.035

8.  Culture, cultural factors and psychiatric diagnosis: review and projections.

Authors:  Renato D Alarcón
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 49.548

9.  Lessons learned from the clinical reappraisal study of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview with Latinos.

Authors:  Margarita Alegria; Patrick E Shrout; Maria Torres; Roberto Lewis-Fernández; Jamie M Abelson; Meris Powell; Alejandro Interian; Julia Lin; Mara Laderman; Glorisa Canino
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.035

10.  Clinical indicators of child development in the capitals of nine Brazilian states: the influence of regional cultural factors.

Authors:  André Laranjeira de Carvalho; Luiz Fernando Ferraz da Silva; Sandra Josefina Ferraz Ellero Grisi; Ana Maria de Ulhôa Escobar
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.