Literature DB >> 8544679

Resampling techniques in the analysis of non-binormal ROC data.

D Mossman1.   

Abstract

The methods most commonly used for analyzing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data incorporate "binormal" assumptions about the latent frequency distributions of test results. Although these assumptions have proved robust to a wide variety of actual frequency distributions, some data sets do not "fit" the binormal model. In such cases, resampling techniques such as the jackknife and the bootstrap provide versatile, distribution-independent, and more appropriate methods for hypothesis testing. This article describes the application of resampling techniques to ROC data for which the binormal assumptions are not appropriate, and suggests that the bootstrap may be especially helpful in determining confidence intervals from small data samples. The widespread availability of ever-faster computers has made resampling methods increasingly accessible and convenient tools for data analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8544679     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9501500406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  8 in total

1.  (18)F-DOPA PET with and without MRI fusion, a receiver operator characteristics comparison.

Authors:  Aaron F Struck; Lance T Hall; Joanna E Kusmirek; Catherine L Gallagher; John M Floberg; Christine J Jaskowiak; Scott B Perlman
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-10-15

2.  Prospective validation of the provisional criteria for the evaluation of response to therapy in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Hermine I Brunner; Gloria C Higgins; Kristina Wiers; Sivia K Lapidus; Judyann C Olson; Karen Onel; Marilynn Punaro; Jun Ying; Marisa S Klein-Gitelman; Edward H Giannini
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  Comparison of standardized clinical classification with fundus photograph grading for the assessment of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema severity.

Authors:  Sapna Gangaputra; James F Lovato; Larry Hubbard; Matthew D Davis; Barbara A Esser; Walter T Ambrosius; Emily Y Chew; Craig Greven; Letitia H Perdue; Wai T Wong; Audree Condren; Charles P Wilkinson; Elvira Agrón; Sharon Adler; Ronald P Danis
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Proteomic analysis of amniotic fluid to identify women with preterm labor and intra-amniotic inflammation/infection: the use of a novel computational method to analyze mass spectrometric profiling.

Authors:  Roberto Romero; Jimmy Espinoza; Wade T Rogers; Allan Moser; Jyh Kae Nien; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Francesca Gotsch; Offer Erez; Ricardo Gomez; Sam Edwin; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2008-06

5.  Breast US computer-aided diagnosis workstation: performance with a large clinical diagnostic population.

Authors:  Karen Drukker; Nicholas P Gruszauskas; Charlene A Sennett; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Performance of breast ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis: dependence on image selection.

Authors:  Nicholas P Gruszauskas; Karen Drukker; Maryellen L Giger; Charlene A Sennett; Lorenzo L Pesce
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Measures, Uncertainties, and Significance Test in Operational ROC Analysis.

Authors:  Jin Chu Wu; Alvin F Martin; Raghu N Kacker
Journal:  J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol       Date:  2011-02-01

Review 8.  Comparing the Predictive Ability of Prognostic Models in Ischemic Stroke; Derivation, Validation, and Discrimination Beyond the ROC Curve.

Authors:  Alireza Esteghamati; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Behnam Heidari; Ali Zandieh; Vahid Eslami
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 4.003

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.