Literature DB >> 8544207

Physical strain and mechanical efficiency in hubcrank and handrim wheelchair propulsion.

L H van der Woude1, E van Kranen, G Ariëns, R H Rozendal, H E Veeger.   

Abstract

The physical strain and mechanical efficiency of manual wheelchair propulsion using handrim and hubcrank propelled racing wheelchairs were studied during a submaximal wheelchair exercise test on a stationary roller ergometer. Ten healthy male able-bodied subjects conducted two exercise tests in a random order and measurements of phyical strain (oxygen uptake, minute ventilation, respiratory exchange ratio, heart rate) and gross mechanical efficiency were obtained. During the experiment torque data, speed and power output were determined at a sample frequency of 0.1 Hz. Analysis of variance for repeated measures (p < 0.05) was used to establish differences. The hubcrank propulsion mechanism showed a significantly lower physical strain and higher gross mechanical efficiency in comparison with the handrim propulsion mechanism. The lower strain and higher efficiency in propelling the hubcrank partly seems to be due to the continuous biphasic cyclic propulsion movement, which allows both push and pull forces to be exerted. This involves flexor and extensor muscles around elbow and shoulder, leading to a reduced tendency to fatigue in individual muscles in the upper extremity. The more natural and neutral wrist-hand orientation also seems to diminish finger flexor activity and wrist-stabilizing muscle activity, and will thus reduce physical strain both with respect to the cardiorespiratory and musculoskeletal systems. The latter may influence the tendency to develop carpal tunnel problems positively. The reduced strain of the hubcrank propulsion mechanism clearly has a number of advantages over handrims for the human engine in the short and long run. However, technical innovation should address current practical problems of steering and braking. Clearly, hubcranks can be used in low-seated wheelchairs (i.e. racing wheelchairs) only, and in subjects with a sufficiently large range of motion in the upper extremity. Moreover, the increased width is a drawback of hubcranks. Care should be taken while negotiating door posts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8544207     DOI: 10.3109/03091909509012418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Eng Technol        ISSN: 0309-1902


  5 in total

Review 1.  Wheelchair propulsion biomechanics: implications for wheelchair sports.

Authors:  Y Vanlandewijck; D Theisen; D Daly
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Manual wheelchair biomechanics while overcoming various environmental barriers: A systematic review.

Authors:  Théo Rouvier; Aude Louessard; Emeline Simonetti; Samuel Hybois; Joseph Bascou; Charles Pontonnier; Hélène Pillet; Christophe Sauret
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Evidence-Based Strategies for Preserving Mobility for Elderly and Aging Manual Wheelchair Users.

Authors:  Philip S Requejo; Jan Furumasu; Sara J Mulroy
Journal:  Top Geriatr Rehabil       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

4.  Practice-based skill acquisition of pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair propulsion versus regular handrim propulsion in novices.

Authors:  Rick de Klerk; Thijs Lutjeboer; Riemer J K Vegter; Lucas H V van der Woude
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Investigating the test-retest reliability of Illinois Agility Test for wheelchair users.

Authors:  Zohreh Salimi; Martin William Ferguson-Pell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.