Literature DB >> 8542973

Reprogramming of muscle activation patterns at the wrist in compensation for elbow reaction torques during planar two-joint arm movements.

J D Cooke1, N Virji-Babul.   

Abstract

The relationship between wrist kinematics, dynamics and the pattern of muscle activation were examined during a two-joint planar movement in which the two joints moved in opposite directions, i.e. elbow flexion/wrist extension and elbow extension/wrist flexion. Elbow movements (ranging from 10 to 70 deg) and wrist movements (ranging from 10 to 50 deg) were performed during a visual, step-tracking task in which subjects were required to attend to the initial and final angles at each joint. As the elbow amplitude increased, wrist movement duration increased and the wrist movement trajectories became quite variable. Analysis of the torques acting at the wrist joint showed that elbow movements produced reaction torques acting in the same direction as the intended wrist movement. Distinct patterns of muscle activation were observed at the wrist joint that were dependent on the relative magnitude of the elbow reaction torque in relation to the net wrist torque. When the magnitude of the elbow reaction torque was quite small, the wrist agonist was activated first. As the magnitude of the elbow reaction torque increased, activity in the wrist agonist decreased significantly. In conditions where the elbow reaction torque was much larger than the net wrist torque, the wrist muscle torque reversed direction to oppose the intended movement. This reversal of wrist muscle torque was directly associated with a change in the pattern of muscle activation where the wrist antagonist was activated prior to the wrist agonist. Our findings indicate that motion of the elbow joint is an important consideration in planning wrist movement. Specifically, the selection of muscle activation patterns at the wrist is dependent on the relative magnitude and direction of the elbow reaction torque in relation to the direction of wrist motion.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8542973     DOI: 10.1007/bf00241366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  16 in total

1.  Abducens internuclear neurons carry an inappropriate signal for ocular convergence.

Authors:  P D Gamlin; J W Gnadt; L E Mays
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus. I. Characteristics of cell discharge.

Authors:  D P Munoz; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Behavior of identified Edinger-Westphal neurons during ocular accommodation.

Authors:  P D Gamlin; Y Zhang; R A Clendaniel; L E Mays
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Cells in the pretectal olivary nucleus are in the pathway for the direct light reflex of the pupil in the rat.

Authors:  L J Trejo; C M Cicerone
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1984-05-21       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Anatomical analysis of pupillary reflex pathways in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  R J Pierson; M B Carpenter
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1974-11-15       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Discharge characteristics of single units in superior colliculus of the alert rhesus monkey.

Authors:  P H Schiller; F Koerner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Luminance and darkness detectors in the olivary and posterior pretectal nuclei and their relationship to the pupillary light reflex in the rat. I. Studies with steady luminance levels.

Authors:  R J Clarke; H Ikeda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Neural control of vergence eye movements: neurons encoding vergence velocity.

Authors:  L E Mays; J D Porter; P D Gamlin; C A Tello
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  An autoradiographic study of the projections of the pretectum in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta): evidence for sensorimotor links to the thalamus and oculomotor nuclei.

Authors:  L A Benevento; M Rezak
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-05-27       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  The pupillary light reflex in normal and innate microstrabismic cats, I: Behavior and receptive-field analysis in the nucleus praetectalis olivaris.

Authors:  C Distler; K P Hoffmann
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.241

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  A critical evaluation of the force control hypothesis in motor control.

Authors:  David J Ostry; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of distal and proximal arm muscles fatigue on multi-joint movement organization.

Authors:  Anne-Fabienne Huffenus; David Amarantini; Nicolas Forestier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Novel muscle patterns for reaching after cervical spinal cord injury: a case for motor redundancy.

Authors:  Gail F Koshland; James C Galloway; Becky Farley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Efficient control of arm movements in advanced age.

Authors:  Gyusung Lee; Laetitia Fradet; Caroline J Ketcham; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Immediate compensation for variations in self-generated Coriolis torques related to body dynamics and carried objects.

Authors:  Pascale Pigeon; Paul Dizio; James R Lackner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Compensating for intersegmental dynamics across the shoulder, elbow, and wrist joints during feedforward and feedback control.

Authors:  Rodrigo S Maeda; Tyler Cluff; Paul L Gribble; J Andrew Pruszynski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Compensation for the effects of head acceleration on jaw movement in speech.

Authors:  D M Shiller; D J Ostry; P L Gribble; R Laboissière
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Spinal circuits can accommodate interaction torques during multijoint limb movements.

Authors:  Thomas Buhrmann; Ezequiel A Di Paolo
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 9.  Neural Control of Stopping and Stabilizing the Arm.

Authors:  Shanie A L Jayasinghe; Robert A Scheidt; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-21

10.  A Donders' Like Law for Arm Movements: The Signal not the Noise.

Authors:  Steven Ewart; Stephanie M Hynes; Warren G Darling; Charles Capaday
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.