Literature DB >> 854253

A computerized obstetric medical record.

W W Stead, R G Brame, W E Hammond, F R Jelovsek, E H Estes, R T Parker.   

Abstract

Duke University has utilized computerized obstetric medical records since 1971. System evolution is described. Deficiencies in the current system appear to evolve from the computer/human interface rather than from basic system design. Critical elements in system success are physician acceptance of the appearance of data collection sheets and printed notes and continual rapid response in programing modification to allow for physician individuality and changes in medical practice. The limiting factor in the potential usefulness of such a system is the rate of incomplete data collection. It is suggested that if the physician were to enter data directly into the computer through a terminal, data collection would be more accurate and complete.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 854253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  9 in total

1.  How the past teaches the future: ACMI distinguished lecture.

Authors:  W E Hammond
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Integration and beyond: linking information from disparate sources and into workflow.

Authors:  W W Stead; R A Miller; M A Musen; W R Hersh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Generating Clinical Notes for Electronic Health Record Systems.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom; William W Stead; Joshua C Denny; Dario Giuse; Nancy M Lorenzi; Steven H Brown; Kevin B Johnson
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Will the wave finally break? A brief view of the adoption of electronic medical records in the United States.

Authors:  Eta S Berner; Don E Detmer; Donald Simborg
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Direct comparison of MEDCIN and SNOMED CT for representation of a general medical evaluation template.

Authors:  Steven H Brown; S Trent Rosenbloom; Brent A Bauer; Dietlind Wahner-Roedler; David A Froehling; Kent R Bailey; Michael J Lincoln; Diane Montella; Elliot M Fielstein; Peter L Elkin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

6.  Data from clinical notes: a perspective on the tension between structure and flexible documentation.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom; Joshua C Denny; Hua Xu; Nancy Lorenzi; William W Stead; Kevin B Johnson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  An integrated, hospital information system based obstetrical medical record and database.

Authors:  T C Peng; J P VanDorsten; P Dilzer; C Perry; G Ozcan; K Adams; L J Dunn
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1991

Review 8.  Practical challenges in integrating genomic data into the electronic health record.

Authors:  Abel N Kho; Luke V Rasmussen; John J Connolly; Peggy L Peissig; Justin Starren; Hakon Hakonarson; M Geoffrey Hayes
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 9.  Information technology in critical care: review of monitoring and data acquisition systems for patient care and research.

Authors:  Michael A De Georgia; Farhad Kaffashi; Frank J Jacono; Kenneth A Loparo
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-02-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.