Literature DB >> 8542103

Maximal bronchoconstriction in humans. Relationship to deep inhalation and airway sensitivity.

R Pellegrino1, B Violante, V Brusasco.   

Abstract

We hypothesized that maximal bronchoconstriction can be predicted from the bronchomoter effect of deep inhalation (DI) and the degree of airway sensitivity to methacholine (MCh). We studied 26 healthy or mildly asthmatic subjects with limited response to MCh (maximal FEV1 decrease, 23 +/- 9 SD%; Group 1) and 26 subjects with moderate to severe asthma with exaggerated response (maximal FEV1 decrease > 40%, Group 2). The effect of DI was quantified as the linear regression coefficient of the percent decrements of maximal (Vm50) versus partial (Vp50) forced expiratory flow at 50% of FVC over the initial steps of challenge (MP slope). Airway sensitivity was inferred from the MCh doses (PDs) causing Vm50 or Vp50 to decrease by 40% or FEV1 by 15%. The absence of limit to bronchonstriction was predicted by either MP slope or any PD with accuracies between 71 and 81%, but with an accuracy of 87% by a discriminant function including MP slope and PD40Vp50. Within Group 1, the maximal FEV1 decrease correlated linearly with MP slope (r2 = 0.41); but it was better predicted by a multiple regression including MP slope and PD40Vp50 (In mg) (r2 = 0.54). We conclude that the magnitude of the bronchodilator effect of DI during induced bronchoconstriction and airway sensitivity predict the level of maximal bronchoconstriction in vivo. We speculate that these parameters reflect some of the mechanisms modulating the response to bronchoconstrictor stimuli such as airway wall structure, airway-to-parenchymal interdependence, and contractile properties of airway smooth muscle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8542103     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.153.1.8542103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  6 in total

1.  Thoracic percussion yields reversible mechanical changes in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Fernando S Guimarães; Walter A Zin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  A novel hypothesis to explain the bronchconstrictor effect of deep inspiration in asthma.

Authors:  G P Burns; G J Gibson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Time intervals (3' or 5') between dose steps can influence methacholine challenge test.

Authors:  Salvatore Mariotta; Bruno Sposato; Alberto Ricci; Francesca De Clementi; Francesco Mannino
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 4.  Airway smooth muscle dynamics: a common pathway of airway obstruction in asthma.

Authors:  S S An; T R Bai; J H T Bates; J L Black; R H Brown; V Brusasco; P Chitano; L Deng; M Dowell; D H Eidelman; B Fabry; N J Fairbank; L E Ford; J J Fredberg; W T Gerthoffer; S H Gilbert; R Gosens; S J Gunst; A J Halayko; R H Ingram; C G Irvin; A L James; L J Janssen; G G King; D A Knight; A M Lauzon; O J Lakser; M S Ludwig; K R Lutchen; G N Maksym; J G Martin; T Mauad; B E McParland; S M Mijailovich; H W Mitchell; R W Mitchell; W Mitzner; T M Murphy; P D Paré; R Pellegrino; M J Sanderson; R R Schellenberg; C Y Seow; P S P Silveira; P G Smith; J Solway; N L Stephens; P J Sterk; A G Stewart; D D Tang; R S Tepper; T Tran; L Wang
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 5.  Clinical implications of airway hyperresponsiveness in COPD.

Authors:  Nicola Scichilone; Salvatore Battaglia; Alba La Sala; Vincenzo Bellia
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2006

6.  Heart rate variability biofeedback: how and why does it work?

Authors:  Paul M Lehrer; Richard Gevirtz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.