Literature DB >> 8541587

Comparison of carbon dioxide, octenol and a host-odour as mosquito attractants in the Upper Rhine Valley, Germany.

N Becker1, M Zgomba, D Petric, M Ludwig.   

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in the Upper Rhine Valley to determine the responses of mosquitoes to CDC traps baited with either CO2, octenol, light or paired combinations of these. Among eight mosquito species caught, the attractant effect on trap catches was studied in the four most abundant: Aedes vexans, Ae.rossicus, Ae.cinereus and Culex pipiens. Traps baited only with light or octenol caught few mosquitoes, whereas many were caught by traps baited with CO2 alone or in combination with either of the other candidate attractants. CO2 baited traps, with or without light, caught the most Aedes. The combination of CO2 and octenol attracted most Cx pipiens, but this apparent synergy was not significant. Using a caged hamster compared to CO2 as bait in a CDC light-trap with only intermittent fan suction, the hamster attracted less mosquitoes than CO2 emitted at a rate of 225 g/h on days 1 and 2, whereas on days 3 and 4 the smell from the hamster's cage became significantly more attractive than this rate of CO2 for all species of mosquitoes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8541587     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1995.tb00008.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Vet Entomol        ISSN: 0269-283X            Impact factor:   2.739


  8 in total

1.  Targeted trapping of mosquito vectors in the Chesapeake Bay area of Maryland.

Authors:  Scott M Shone; Gregory E Glass; Douglas E Norris
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.278

Review 2.  Mosquito Attractants.

Authors:  Laurent Dormont; Margaux Mulatier; David Carrasco; Anna Cohuet
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Field evaluation of four widely used mosquito traps in Central Europe.

Authors:  Renke Lühken; Wolf Peter Pfitzner; Jessica Börstler; Rolf Garms; Katrin Huber; Nino Schork; Sonja Steinke; Ellen Kiel; Norbert Becker; Egbert Tannich; Andreas Krüger
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Evaluations of dual attractant toxic sugar baits for surveillance and control of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Florida.

Authors:  Jodi M Scott-Fiorenzano; Alice P Fulcher; Kelly E Seeger; Sandra A Allan; Daniel L Kline; Philip G Koehler; Günter C Müller; Rui-De Xue
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.876

5.  Evaluation of Methods to Collect Diurnal Culicidae (Diptera) at Canopy and Ground Strata, in the Atlantic Forest Biome.

Authors:  Juliana Telles de Deus; Luís Filipe Mucci; Simone Lucheta Reginatto; Mariza Pereira; Eduardo Sterlino Bergo; Vera Lucia Fonseca de Camargo-Neves
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.769

6.  Comparative efficacy of BG-Sentinel 2 and CDC-like mosquito traps for monitoring potential malaria vectors in Europe.

Authors:  Michela Bertola; Diletta Fornasiero; Sofia Sgubin; Luca Mazzon; Marco Pombi; Fabrizio Montarsi
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 4.047

7.  Evaluation of CDC light traps for mosquito surveillance in a malaria endemic area on the Thai-Myanmar border.

Authors:  Patchara Sriwichai; Stephan Karl; Yudthana Samung; Suchada Sumruayphol; Kirakorn Kiattibutr; Anon Payakkapol; Ivo Mueller; Guiyun Yan; Liwang Cui; Jetsumon Sattabongkot
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 8.  Monitoring population and environmental parameters of invasive mosquito species in Europe.

Authors:  Dušan Petrić; Romeo Bellini; Ernst-Jan Scholte; Laurence Marrama Rakotoarivony; Francis Schaffner
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.876

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.