PURPOSE: Because standard methods to determine intraocular lens power are not adequate in eyes that have had radial keratotomy, we undertook this study to evaluate the corneal power derived from computerized videokeratography for use in intraocular lens power calculations. METHODS: We examined four eyes of three patients who had radial keratotomy and who underwent phacoemulsification cataract surgery with implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. We used a computerized videokeratography-derived corneal curvature value in the Holladay formula for intraocular lens calculations. We determined the ideal intraocular lens power and the keratometric value that would have led to the ideal intraocular lens power from the postoperative refraction at 6.1 +/- 1.1 months after cataract extraction. The ideal keratometric value was compared with the keratometric values derived from computerized videokeratography, standard keratometry, contact lens overrefraction, and refractions before and after radial keratotomy. RESULTS: The postoperative refraction at approximately six months averaged -0.32 +/- 0.63 diopter (range, -0.88 to +0.75 diopter) different than the aim. The mean power in ring 3, which was the closest keratometric value to the ideal, disclosed only 0.09 +/- 0.73 diopter and -0.10 +/- 0.72 diopter of deviation from the ideal keratometric and intraocular lens powers, respectively. One to two weeks after phacoemulsification cataract surgery with implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens, the videokeratographic differential map disclosed steepening at the wound site with variable regression by six months in all patients. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that, after radial keratotomy, using the keratometric value derived from computerized videokeratography in intraocular lens calculations is more accurate than using keratometric values measured by routine methods.
PURPOSE: Because standard methods to determine intraocular lens power are not adequate in eyes that have had radial keratotomy, we undertook this study to evaluate the corneal power derived from computerized videokeratography for use in intraocular lens power calculations. METHODS: We examined four eyes of three patients who had radial keratotomy and who underwent phacoemulsification cataract surgery with implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. We used a computerized videokeratography-derived corneal curvature value in the Holladay formula for intraocular lens calculations. We determined the ideal intraocular lens power and the keratometric value that would have led to the ideal intraocular lens power from the postoperative refraction at 6.1 +/- 1.1 months after cataract extraction. The ideal keratometric value was compared with the keratometric values derived from computerized videokeratography, standard keratometry, contact lens overrefraction, and refractions before and after radial keratotomy. RESULTS: The postoperative refraction at approximately six months averaged -0.32 +/- 0.63 diopter (range, -0.88 to +0.75 diopter) different than the aim. The mean power in ring 3, which was the closest keratometric value to the ideal, disclosed only 0.09 +/- 0.73 diopter and -0.10 +/- 0.72 diopter of deviation from the ideal keratometric and intraocular lens powers, respectively. One to two weeks after phacoemulsification cataract surgery with implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens, the videokeratographic differential map disclosed steepening at the wound site with variable regression by six months in all patients. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that, after radial keratotomy, using the keratometric value derived from computerized videokeratography in intraocular lens calculations is more accurate than using keratometric values measured by routine methods.