Literature DB >> 8540514

A prospective comparison of laparoscopy and imaging in the staging of esophagogastric cancer before surgery.

M G O'Brien1, E F Fitzgerald, G Lee, M Crowley, F Shanahan, G C O'Sullivan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To carry out a prospective comparison of laparoscopy and combined imaging (CT and ultrasound) in the preoperative staging of distal esophageal and gastric cancer in patients who were selected for surgery.
METHODS: Patients with clinically overt metastases or a contraindication to major surgery were excluded. One hundred and forty-five patients underwent chest radiography, CT of mediastinum and abdomen, and ultrasonography of abdomen and laparoscopy. The primary diagnoses were adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric region in 110 cases, squamous cell carcinoma of the distal esophagus in 30 patients, and five miscellaneous.
RESULTS: Thirty nine (27%) patients had metastatic disease outside the potential field of resection. Metastases were detected preoperatively by laparoscopy in 30 patients (sensitivity 77%) and by combined imaging in 15 (sensitivity 38%) (p < 0.01). Twenty four patients with adenocarcinoma had metastases to the peritoneal cavity, which were detected preoperatively by laparoscopy in 23 (sensitivity 96%) and by combined imaging in five (sensitivity 21%) (p < 0.01). Peritoneal metastases were not seen in patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Fifteen patients had hepatic metastases, which were detected preoperatively by laparoscopy in nine (sensitivity 60%) and by combined imaging in seven (sensitivity 47%). Laparoscopy was more sensitive than combined imaging in detecting metastases in patients with adenocarcinoma [laparoscopy 28, combined imaging 10 (p < 0.01)].
CONCLUSION: Addition of laparoscopy to the staging protocol prevented unbeneficial thoraco-abdominal exploration in 20 patients with adenocarcinoma. Thus, laparoscopy should be used in the assessment of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric region before performing excisional surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8540514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  7 in total

1.  Laparoscopic staging of gastric cancer is safe and affects treatment strategy.

Authors:  P McCulloch; M Johnson; R Jairam; W Fischer
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Diagnostic laparoscopy: indications and benefits.

Authors:  Beate Rau; Michael Hünerbein
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Cytology of peritoneal lavage performed during staging laparoscopy for gastrointestinal malignancies: is it useful?

Authors:  E J Nieveen van Dijkum; P D Sturm; L T de Wit; J Offerhaus; H Obertop; D J Gouma
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Laparoscopy, computerised tomography and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction cancers.

Authors:  A Mirza; S Galloway
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  [Staging laparoscopy in oncology].

Authors:  H Feussner; F Härtl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Role of staging laparoscopy in gastric malignancies - our institutional experience.

Authors:  Vishal G Shelat; Juin Fong Thong; Melanie Seah; Khong Hee Lim
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-09-27

Review 7.  Laparoscopic surgery for cancer: a systematic review and a way forward.

Authors:  Eliane Angst; Jonathan R Hiatt; Beat Gloor; Howard A Reber; O Joe Hines
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 6.113

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.