Literature DB >> 8536894

Endoscopic estimation of size: improved accuracy by directed teaching.

E Schwartz1, M F Catalano, B Krevsky.   

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated the inaccuracy of endoscopic estimation of size. Although several devices have been developed to help improve estimation of size, none are convenient for clinical use. We have designed and evaluated a clinical teaching protocol to aid endoscopists in better estimating size. Thirteen "endoscopists" with varying levels of experience (none, less than 1 year, more than 1 year) estimated the size of six steel ball bearings placed into a model colon and viewed with a videoendoscope. They were then taught to compensate for optic distortion and retested immediately after teaching and again 1 month later. The mean error of estimation decreased from 28% before teaching to 8% after teaching (p < .05) and rose to 12% 1 month later (p < .05). Although the indices of mean error decreased immediately after teaching in all groups, only those individuals with less than 1 year of endoscopic experience retained the improvement 1 month after teaching. We conclude that endoscopists can be taught how to compensate for the optic distortion encountered during endoscopy. This teaching is most effective if performed early in the training program.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8536894     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(95)70124-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  8 in total

Review 1.  Polyp size measurement at CT colonography: what do we know and what do we need to know?

Authors:  Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Polyp measurement and size categorisation by CT colonography: effect of observer experience in a multi-centre setting.

Authors:  David Burling; Steve Halligan; Douglas G Altman; Wendy Atkin; Clive Bartram; Helen Fenlon; Andrea Laghi; Jaap Stoker; Stuart Taylor; Roger Frost; Guido Dessey; Melinda De Villiers; Jasper Florie; Shane Foley; Lesley Honeyfield; Riccardo Iannaccone; Teresa Gallo; Clive Kay; Philippe Lefere; Andrew Lowe; Filipo Mangiapane; Jesse Marrannes; Emmanuele Neri; Giulia Nieddu; David Nicholson; Alan O'Hare; Sante Ori; Benedetta Politi; Martin Poulus; Daniele Regge; Lisa Renaut; Velauthan Rudralingham; Saverio Signoretta; Paola Vagli; Victor Van der Hulst; Jane Williams-Butt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Canadian credentialing guidelines for colonoscopy.

Authors:  J Romagnuolo; R Enns; T Ponich; J Springer; D Armstrong; A N Barkun
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.522

4.  Measurement of colonic polyps by radiologists and endoscopists: who is most accurate?

Authors:  S Punwani; S Halligan; P Irving; S Bloom; A Bungay; R Greenhalgh; J Godbold; S A Taylor; D G Altman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Canadian credentialing guidelines for esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Authors:  Terry Ponich; Robert Enns; Joseph Romagnuolo; Jonathan Springer; David Armstrong; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.522

6.  Efficacy of tele-endoscopy in a rural capitated market.

Authors:  P L Moses; J J McGowan; M A Ricci
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997

7.  Characterization of the pathologic and endoscopic measurements of colorectal polyp sizes with a focus on sessile serrated adenoma and high-grade dysplasia.

Authors:  Fan Li; Zheng Chen; Yu Yang; Xianghua Yi; Yunsheng Yang; Lanjing Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-03-15

8.  Endoscopic estimation of tumor size in early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jeongmin Choi; Sang Gyun Kim; Jong Pil Im; Joo Sung Kim; Hyun Chae Jung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.199

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.