Literature DB >> 8535991

Late results following proximal reinsertion of isolated ruptured ACL ligaments.

F Genelin1, A Trost, C Primavesi, P Knoll.   

Abstract

Between 1982 and 1984, 49 patients with fresh isolated proximal ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) were operated on in the Trauma Hospital, Salzburg. The operation was performed within 1 week of trauma. The operational technique used was proximal reinsertion of the ruptured ACL alone. Postoperatively the knee was immobilized for 6 weeks in an above-the-knee plaster cast. We were able to re-examine 42 of the 49 patients 5-7 years after injury. In addition to a clinical examination, testing with a KT-1000 arthrometer was performed. The objective and subjective results we found were evaluated using the Lsyholm score and OAK knee evaluation form. We found 12 (29%) absolutely stable knee joints. We accepted a KT-1000 result of up to 3 mm as satisfactory, and 81% of our patients were in this category. The same percentage (81%) scored between 85 and 100 points on the Lysholm scale. Only 52% scored over 90 points on the OAK form. Subjectively only 6 patients (14%) were dissatisfied with their result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8535991     DOI: 10.1007/bf01552153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  12 in total

1.  Isolated tear of the anterior cruciate ligament: 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  J A Feagin; W W Curl
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1976 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Early arthroscopic evaluation of acute repair of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  C Andersson; M Odensten; J Gillquist
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  OAK knee evaluation. A new way to assess knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  W Müller; R Biedert; F Hefti; R P Jakob; U Munzinger; H U Stäubli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Surgical or conservative treatment of the acutely torn anterior cruciate ligament. A randomized study with short-term follow-up observations.

Authors:  M Odensten; P Hamberg; M Nordin; J Lysholm; J Gillquist
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Intra-articular cruciate reconstruction. I: Perspectives on graft strength, vascularization, and immediate motion after replacement.

Authors:  F R Noyes; D L Butler; L E Paulos; E S Grood
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The course of knee-ligament injuries.

Authors:  B Balkfors
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1982

7.  The symptomatic anterior cruciate-deficient knee. Part I: the long-term functional disability in athletically active individuals.

Authors:  F R Noyes; P A Mooar; D S Matthews; D L Butler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The symptomatic anterior cruciate-deficient knee. Part II: the results of rehabilitation, activity modification, and counseling on functional disability.

Authors:  F R Noyes; D S Matthews; P A Mooar; E S Grood
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Acute anterior cruciate ligament injury and augmented repair. Experimental studies.

Authors:  H E Cabaud; J A Feagin; W G Rodkey
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1980 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  11 in total

1.  Histological evaluation of the healing potential of the anterior cruciate ligament by means of augmented and non-augmented repair: an in vivo animal study.

Authors:  Helmut Seitz; Wolfgang A Menth-Chiari; Susanna Lang; Thomas Nau
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of augmented and nonaugmented primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: an in vivo animal study.

Authors:  Helmut Seitz; Wofgang Pichl; Veronika Matzi; Thomas Nau
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging predicts eligibility for arthroscopic primary anterior cruciate ligament repair.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Gregory S DiFelice
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Successful Arthroscopic Primary Repair of a Chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear 11 Years Following Injury.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Gregory S DiFelice
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-11-18

5.  Arthroscopic Primary Repair of Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears.

Authors:  Gregory S DiFelice; Jelle P van der List
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-09-19

6.  Anterior cruciate ligament suture in comparison with plasty. A 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  D Träger; K Pohle; W Tschirner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 7.  Rehabilitation Principles to Consider for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair.

Authors:  Jocelyn Wu; Jamie L Kator; Michael Zarro; Natalie L Leong
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.355

8.  Arthroscopic Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With Suture Augmentation.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Gregory S DiFelice
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-09-11

9.  The Location of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: A Prevalence Study Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Douglas N Mintz; Gregory S DiFelice
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-06-22

10.  Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging following Arthroscopic Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Douglas N Mintz; Gregory S DiFelice
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2019-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.