Literature DB >> 8535673

Urinary tract obstruction and nephrostomy drainage in pelvic malignant disease.

M W Lau1, D E Temperley, S Mehta, R J Johnson, R J Barnard, N W Clarke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the survival of patients after percutaneous nephrostomy drainage (PND) for obstructive uropathy secondary to pelvic malignant disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 77 patients undergoing PND for obstructive uropathy were reviewed. Patients were classified according to the nature of the obstructing lesion: Group I (primary untreated malignancy, 31 patients); Group II (recurrent malignancy with further treatment, 15 patients); Group III (recurrent malignancy with no further treatment, 12 patients); and Group IV (benign disease as a consequence of previous treatment, 19 patients). Outcome was assessed by survival over a mean follow-up of 20 months (range 2 days-8.3 years).
RESULTS: Overall median survival was 26 weeks, with a 5-year survival of 22%. The survival in Groups I and II was not significantly different (median survival 27 and 20 weeks, respectively; 5-year survival, 10% and 20%, respectively). Group III patients had a poor prognosis (median survival 6.5 weeks) with no patient surviving beyond one year, whilst Group IV patients fared best with a 5-year survival of 64%. The commonest primary tumour type was carcinoma of the cervix (42 patients), and these patients were analysed as a subset. Benign post-radiation fibrosis was found in 16 of 27 patients (59%). Survival was related to the diagnostic group.
CONCLUSION: The nature and extent of the obstructing lesion and its potential for further treatment are the major determinants of post-nephrostomy survival. Every effort should therefore be made to identify the nature of the obstruction before deciding on PND.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8535673     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1995.tb07779.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  4 in total

1.  Which is better in patients with hydronephrosis before radical cystectomy-percutaneous nephrostomy versus internal ureteral stents.

Authors:  Bum Sik Tae; Ja Hyeon Ku
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-12

2.  Palliative care of malignant ureteral obstruction with polytetrafluoroethylene membrane-covered self-expandable metallic stents: initial experience.

Authors:  Jae Han Kim; Kanghyon Song; Moon Ki Jo; Jong-Wook Park
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-09-19

3.  Malignant ureteral obstruction: Whether decompression really improves patient outcomes and quality of life?

Authors:  K Muruganandham; Rakesh Kapoor
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-01

4.  The profile of patients with obstructive uropathy in Cameroon: case of the Douala General Hospital.

Authors:  Marie Patrice Halle; Linda Njonkam Toukep; Samuel Ekane Nzuobontane; Hermine Fouda Ebana; Gregory Halle Ekane; Eugene Belley Priso
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2016-03-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.