Literature DB >> 8532707

Multiparameter flow cytometric DNA analysis of effusions: a prospective study of 36 cases compared with routine cytology and immunohistochemistry.

M G Joseph1, D Banerjee, P Harris, S Gibson, R G McFadden.   

Abstract

Single-parameter flow cytometry (SFCM) is limited in its ability to detect aneuploid and diploid malignant cells or accurately estimate S-phase fractions (SPF) in effusions because of the high degree of contamination by benign mesothelial cells and inflammatory cells. We examined 36 pleural and peritoneal fluids by conventional cytology and multiparameter FCM (MFCM) to analyze the DNA content of cells expressing epithelial markers cytokeratin, epithelial membrane antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen, BRST-1, or BRST-3 (B72.3) and compared the results to those found with SCFM. The cases were also studied by immunohistochemistry using the same antibody panel. By routine cytology, 14 of the 36 cases were classified as carcinomas, 11 as reactive, 1 as mesothelioma, and 10 as suspicious. MFCM allowed reclassification of 5 of the 10 suspicious cases as carcinomas and the remaining 5 as reactive cases based on ploidy and marker expression. Whereas SFCM detected only 13 nondiploid carcinomas, MFCM detected 4 diploid and 15 nondiploid carcinomas. All reactive cases were diploid by SFCM or MFCM. The mesothelioma case showed were distinct peaks by MFCM, a diploid peak with SPF of 13.4% and a tetraploid peak with SPF of 36.1%. The SPF of the nondiploid carcinomas ranged from 5.9 to 50.4% and diploid carcinomas, from 3.5 to 14.5% when gated on epithelial cells. The reactive cases had SPF ranging from 0.4 to 4.4%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8532707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  5 in total

1.  Flow cytometric immunophenotyping of serous effusions and peritoneal washings: comparison with immunocytochemistry and morphological findings.

Authors:  B Risberg; B Davidson; H P Dong; J M Nesland; A Berner
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cholesterol assays of ascitic fluid in cases of inconclusive cytology.

Authors:  M Gulyás; A D Kaposi; G Elek; L G Szollár; A Hjerpe
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Differential diagnostic significance of the paucity of HLA-I antigens on metastatic breast carcinoma cells in effusions.

Authors:  E Magyarosy; W J Martin; E W Chu; S E Martin
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 4.  Serous effusions: diagnosis of malignancy beyond cytomorphology. An analytic review.

Authors:  S K Mohanty; P Dey
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization improves the detection of malignant cells in effusions from breast cancer patients.

Authors:  N Zojer; M Fiegl; J Angerler; L Müllauer; A Gsur; S Roka; M Pecherstorfer; H Huber; J Drach
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.