Literature DB >> 8532620

A 10-year survey, 1980-1990, of prenatally diagnosed small supernumerary marker chromosomes, identified by FISH analysis. Outcome and follow-up of 14 cases diagnosed in a series of 12,699 prenatal samples.

K Brøndum-Nielsen1, M Mikkelsen.   

Abstract

A cytogenetic survey and follow-up studies were made of 14 cases with supernumerary marker chromosomes, identified among 12,699 prenatal samples, investigated at our institution over a 10-year period from 1980 to 1990. FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) techniques were employed to identify the chromosomal origin of the marker chromosomes. Five cases were familial, all derived from acrocentric chromosomes, and all without apparent phenotypic effects in the children. Nine cases represented de novo aberrations. In two cases (one with a marker from chromosome 14 or 22, the other with a ring-like marker derived from chromosome 17), the pregnancies continued and apparently normal babies were delivered at term, but the child with a marker derived from chromosome 17 showed slight psychomotor retardation at 2 years of age. All other pregnancies with de novo markers were terminated. In three cases, significant abnormalities were found at autopsy. One of these had an isochromosome 12p and the phenotype was consistent with Pallister-Killian syndrome. In conclusion, marker chromosome identification, as well as clinical follow-up, is essential for the purpose of improving genetic counselling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8532620     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1970150705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  9 in total

1.  Redefining the risks of prenatally ascertained supernumerary marker chromosomes: a collaborative study.

Authors:  M D Graf; L Christ; J T Mascarello; P Mowrey; M Pettenati; G Stetten; P Storto; U Surti; D L Van Dyke; G H Vance; D Wolff; S Schwartz
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 2.  Small extra ring chromosome derived from chromosome 10p: clinical report and characterisation by FISH.

Authors:  E Blennow; E Tillberg
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Update and Review: Supernumerary Marker Chromosomes.

Authors:  S Ungerleider
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for rapid distinction between unique sequence positive and negative marker chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Diane Van Opstal; Marjan Boter; Petra Noomen; Malgorzata Srebniak; Guus Hamers; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Supernumerary marker chromosomes derived from chromosome 6: cytogenetic, molecular cytogenetic, and array CGH characterization.

Authors:  Bing Huang; Phyllis Pearle; Katherine A Rauen; Philip D Cotter
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 6.  De novo formed satellite DNA-based mammalian artificial chromosomes and their possible applications.

Authors:  Robert L Katona
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Clinicopathological study of bilateral developmental cataracts diagnosed in utero.

Authors:  Fiona Roberts; Stephen Wisdom; Allan G Howatson; Stuart Imrie
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Case Report: Early Neonatal EEG in Two Infants with Pallister Killian Syndrome (PKS).

Authors:  Carol M Stephens; Andreea M Pavel; Sean R Mathieson; Niamh McSweeney; Brian McNamara; Michael Moore; Geraldine B Boylan
Journal:  HRB Open Res       Date:  2022-02-18

9.  Complex rearranged small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC), three new cases; evidence for an underestimated entity?

Authors:  Vladimir Trifonov; Simon Fluri; Franz Binkert; Adayapalam Nandini; Jasen Anderson; Laura Rodriguez; Madeleine Gross; Nadezda Kosyakova; Hasmik Mkrtchyan; Elisabeth Ewers; Daniela Reich; Anja Weise; Thomas Liehr
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.009

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.