Literature DB >> 8532307

Small amounts of chromatic aberration influence dynamic accommodation.

P B Kruger1, S Nowbotsing, K R Aggarwala, S Mathews.   

Abstract

The prevailing view of accommodation is that the eye changes focus to maximize luminance contrast by trial and error. Negative feedback is considered essential in this view because luminance contrast provides no directional information. Fincham proposed an alternate view in which longitudinal (axial) chromatic aberration (LCA) provides a directional stimulus for accommodation. For spatial frequencies above approximately 0.5 cpd contrast of the retinal image is different for long, middle, and short spectral waveband components of the image. We varied the amount of LCA in small steps (0.25 D) to determine how much LCA is needed to enhance or impair the response. An infrared optometer monitored accommodation continuously while subjects viewed a yellow/black square-wave grating (3.5 cpd) in a Badal stimulus system. The yellow/black grating was produced by superimposing red (600 nm) and green (520 nm) gratings, and LCA was increased, decreased, neutralized, and reversed by repositioning the red grating component along the axis of the optical system. Target vergence was modulated sinusoidally (0.2 Hz) over a 1 D range (1.5 to 2.5 D) and gain and phase-lag of the accommodation response were determined by Fourier analysis. Subjects accommodated well as long as a normal amount of LCA was present--0.5 D in the correct direction enhanced accommodative gain, and 0.25 D in the reverse direction markedly inhibited the response. We conclude that the contrast of the retinal image in different spectral wavebands specifies focus of the eye, and provides a powerful directional stimulus for reflex accommodation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8532307     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199509000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  8 in total

1.  The impact of higher-order aberrations on the strength of directional signals produced by accommodative microfluctuations.

Authors:  Sangeetha Metlapally; Jianliang L Tong; Humza J Tahir; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Signals for defocus arise from longitudinal chromatic aberration in chick.

Authors:  Frances J Rucker; Rhea T Eskew; Christopher Taylor
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 3.  Aberrations and accommodation.

Authors:  Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; Philip B Kruger; Francisco Lara; Norberto López-Gil
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Accommodation to wavefront vergence and chromatic aberration.

Authors:  Yinan Wang; Philip B Kruger; James S Li; Peter L Lin; Lawrence R Stark
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Dynamic accommodation with simulated targets blurred with high order aberrations.

Authors:  Enrique Gambra; Yinan Wang; Jing Yuan; Philip B Kruger; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Longitudinal chromatic aberration of the human infant eye.

Authors:  Jingyun Wang; T Rowan Candy; Danielle F W Teel; Robert J Jacobs
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  There is more to accommodation of the eye than simply minimizing retinal blur.

Authors:  I Marín-Franch; A J Del Águila-Carrasco; P Bernal-Molina; J J Esteve-Taboada; N López-Gil; R Montés-Micó; P B Kruger
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Human eyes do not need monochromatic aberrations for dynamic accommodation.

Authors:  Paula Bernal-Molina; Iván Marín-Franch; Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; Jose J Esteve-Taboada; Norberto López-Gil; Philip B Kruger; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.117

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.