BACKGROUND: Neuroblastoma is a childhood tumor derived from cells of the neural crest, with a widely variable outcome. Differences in the behavior and prognosis of the tumor suggest that neuroblastoma can be divided into several biologic subgroups. We evaluated the most frequent genetic abnormalities in neuroblastoma to determine their prognostic value. METHODS: We used Southern blot analysis to study the allelic loss of chromosomes 1p, 4p, 11q, and 14q, the duplication of chromosome 17q, and the amplification of the N-myc oncogene in 89 neuroblastomas. We also determined the nuclear DNA content of the tumor cells. RESULTS: Allelic loss of chromosome 1p, N-myc amplification, and extra copies of chromosome 17q were significantly associated with unfavorable outcome. In a multivariate analysis, loss of chromosome 1p was the most powerful prognostic factor. It provided strong prognostic information when it was included in multivariate models containing the prognostic factors of age and stage or serum ferritin level and stage. Among the patients with stage I, II, or IVS disease, the mean (+/- SD) three-year event-free survival was 100 percent in those without allelic loss of chromosome 1p and 34 +/- 15 percent in those with such loss; the rates of three-year event-free survival among the patients with stage III and stage IV disease were 53 +/- 10 percent and 0 percent, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The loss of chromosome 1p is a strong prognostic factor in patients with neuroblastoma, independently of age and stage. It reliably identifies patients at high risk in stages I, II, and IVS, which are otherwise clinically favorable. More intensive therapy may be considered in these patients. Patients in stages III and IV with allelic loss of chromosome 1p have a very poor outlook, whereas those without such loss are at moderate risk.
BACKGROUND:Neuroblastoma is a childhood tumor derived from cells of the neural crest, with a widely variable outcome. Differences in the behavior and prognosis of the tumor suggest that neuroblastoma can be divided into several biologic subgroups. We evaluated the most frequent genetic abnormalities in neuroblastoma to determine their prognostic value. METHODS: We used Southern blot analysis to study the allelic loss of chromosomes 1p, 4p, 11q, and 14q, the duplication of chromosome 17q, and the amplification of the N-myc oncogene in 89 neuroblastomas. We also determined the nuclear DNA content of the tumor cells. RESULTS: Allelic loss of chromosome 1p, N-myc amplification, and extra copies of chromosome 17q were significantly associated with unfavorable outcome. In a multivariate analysis, loss of chromosome 1p was the most powerful prognostic factor. It provided strong prognostic information when it was included in multivariate models containing the prognostic factors of age and stage or serum ferritin level and stage. Among the patients with stage I, II, or IVS disease, the mean (+/- SD) three-year event-free survival was 100 percent in those without allelic loss of chromosome 1p and 34 +/- 15 percent in those with such loss; the rates of three-year event-free survival among the patients with stage III and stage IV disease were 53 +/- 10 percent and 0 percent, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The loss of chromosome 1p is a strong prognostic factor in patients with neuroblastoma, independently of age and stage. It reliably identifies patients at high risk in stages I, II, and IVS, which are otherwise clinically favorable. More intensive therapy may be considered in these patients. Patients in stages III and IV with allelic loss of chromosome 1p have a very poor outlook, whereas those without such loss are at moderate risk.
Authors: J Mora; N K Cheung; B H Kushner; M P LaQuaglia; K Kramer; M Fazzari; G Heller; L Chen; W L Gerald Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Octavio Burgues; Samuel Navarro; Rosa Noguera; Antonio Pellín; Amparo Ruiz; Victoria Castel; Antonio Llombart-Bosch Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2006-08-29 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Chunxi Wang; Zhihui Liu; Chan-Wook Woo; Zhijie Li; Lifeng Wang; Jun S Wei; Victor E Marquez; Susan E Bates; Qihuang Jin; Javed Khan; Kai Ge; Carol J Thiele Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: David L Baker; Mary L Schmidt; Susan L Cohn; John M Maris; Wendy B London; Allen Buxton; Daniel Stram; Robert P Castleberry; Hiroyuki Shimada; Anthony Sandler; Robert C Shamberger; A Thomas Look; C Patrick Reynolds; Robert C Seeger; Katherine K Matthay Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-09-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christine L O'Keefe; Ramon Tiu; Lukasz P Gondek; Jennifer Powers; Karl S Theil; Matt Kalaycio; Alan Lichtin; Mikkael A Sekeres; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski Journal: Exp Hematol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: John M Maris; George Hii; Craig A Gelfand; Shobha Varde; Peter S White; Eric Rappaport; Saul Surrey; Paolo Fortina Journal: Genome Res Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 9.043