Literature DB >> 8530120

Preliminary validation of a measure of life support preferences.

D K Beland1, R D Froman.   

Abstract

A rapid, easy to use instrument that provides illustrations of life support choices can enhance discussion of life support measures with patients. The goal of this preliminary study was to develop and validate an instrument, the Life Support Preferences Questionnaire (LSPQ). In a convenience sample of 116 healthy adults, the LSPQ showed a sturdy degree of internal consistency for a short measure. The 2-week stability evidence was supportive of respondents' consistent attitudes over time at both the item and scale level. Principal factor analyses give evidence there is one dominant theme underlying the items. Use of the LSPQ with hospitalized patients is being explored as a response to policy changes resulting from the 1991 Patient Self-Determination Act.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8530120     DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1995.tb00893.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Image J Nurs Sch        ISSN: 0743-5150


  4 in total

1.  Stability over time in the preferences of older persons for life-sustaining treatment.

Authors:  Ines M Barrio-Cantalejo; Pablo Simón-Lorda; Adoración Molina-Ruiz; Fátima Herrera-Ramos; Encarnación Martínez-Cruz; Rosa Maria Bailon-Gómez; Antonio López-Rico; Patricia Peinado Gorlat
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  [Validation of the Life-Support Preferences Questionnaire (LSPQ) for its use in Spain].

Authors:  Inés María Barrio-Cantalejo; Rosa María Bailón Gómez; María Carmen Cámara Medina; María Angeles Carmona Cabezas; María Encarnación Martínez Cruz; Paula Quesada Lupiáñez
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.137

3.  Promoting advance planning for health care and research among older adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Gina Bravo; Marcel Arcand; Danièle Blanchette; Anne-Marie Boire-Lavigne; Marie-France Dubois; Maryse Guay; Paule Hottin; Julie Lane; Judith Lauzon; Suzanne Bellemare
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  How should treatment decisions be made for incapacitated patients, and why?

Authors:  David I Shalowitz; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; David Wendler
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 11.069

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.