Literature DB >> 8527608

Population cycles in northern small mammals.

K Norrdahl1.   

Abstract

I. The regular multiannual oscillations of small mammals at northern latitudes have been a subject of intensive study from the beginning of this century. The existence of a subjective bias in the research due to different schools of study together with a long series of failures and seemingly contradictory results in experiments testing a multitude of hypotheses have brought confusion to the field of study. Much of this confusion has resulted from a failure to recognize sharply the problem studied, which in turn has masked the progress made during the years. Northern mammal cycles are not a single problem but a composition of many related problems. Every problem may have a single-factor explanation, but even with a single-factor explanation, one factor is not necessarily an answer to all of the related problems. 2. At present, we can state that the cyclicity is caused by a predator-prey interaction. Both the 8-11-year and the 3-5-year cycles may be special cases of a more general cycle, most likely caused by a herbivore-resident specialist predator interaction, where the period of the cycles is determined by size-related constraints affecting the increase rate of the populations. The factors determining the amplitude of the cycles probably vary regionally and/or temporally. The operation of generalist and nomadic predators is largely responsible for the regional and geographic synchrony in cycles, although climatic factors may also contribute to the geographic synchrony. The northern distribution of animal communities; both these factors affect the density of generalist predators, which act as a stabilizing factor in the system. The age-related survival pattern seems to be mainly caused by predation, and the cyclically fluctuating reproductive output and mean body mass may be caused by changes in prey behaviour in response to fluctuating predation risk. Thus, we can already give a plausible explanation for most problems related to northern mammal cycles. 3. In all problems discussed, predation seems to be involved, and in most problems, it seems to be the factor which explains the observed patterns. Thus, as a generalization, it can be said that predation seems to be the key factor in the explanation of the northern multiannual cycles of small mammals. 4. There seems to be a linkage between diversity and cyclicity, probably because the diversity of the community (the number of prey species available) may determine the diet choice of a predator, which in turn determines whether the predators have a stabilizing or a destabilizing impact on prey populations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8527608     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1995.tb01654.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  15 in total

1.  Experimental tests of predation and food hypotheses for population cycles of voles.

Authors:  T Klemola; M Koivula; E Korpimäki; K Norrdahl
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Nonlinearity in the predation risk of prey mobility.

Authors:  P B Banks; K Norrdahl; E Korpimäki
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Cyclic variation in seasonal recruitment and the evolution of the seasonal decline in Ural owl clutch size.

Authors:  Jon E Brommer; Hannu Pietiäinen; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Dynamic effects of predators on cyclic voles: field experimentation and model extrapolation.

Authors:  Erkki Korpimäki; Kai Norrdahl; Tero Klemola; Terje Pettersen; Nils Chr Stenseth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Serological survey of rodent-borne viruses in Finnish field voles.

Authors:  Kristian M Forbes; Liina Voutilainen; Anne Jääskeläinen; Tarja Sironen; Paula M Kinnunen; Peter Stuart; Olli Vapalahti; Heikki Henttonen; Otso Huitu
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.133

6.  Phase- and density-dependent population dynamics in Norwegian lemmings: interaction between deterministic and stochastic processes.

Authors:  N C Stenseth; K S Chan; E Framstad; H Tong
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  How do variations in seasonality affect population cycles?

Authors:  Rachel A Taylor; Andrew White; Jonathan A Sherratt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Of lemmings and snowshoe hares: the ecology of northern Canada.

Authors:  Charles J Krebs
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Ural owl sex allocation and parental investment under poor food conditions.

Authors:  Jon E Brommer; Patrik Karell; Tuomo Pihlaja; Jodie N Painter; Craig R Primmer; Hannu Pietiäinen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Supplementary fed Ural owls increase their reproductive output with a one year time lag.

Authors:  Jon E Brommer; Patrik Karell; Hannu Pietiäinen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.