Literature DB >> 8526678

Quality initiatives and the power of the database: what they are and how they run.

F L Grover1, K E Hammermeister, A L Shroyer.   

Abstract

The criteria by which healthcare is judged or measured are quality, accessibility, and cost effectiveness. To evaluate these criteria it is important to have a database. There are many strengths and weakness to large databases. They can be used as an indicator of the level of performance or quality, for clinical decision making, and as a measurement of cost effectiveness. They can also be useful in the evaluation and development of treatment algorithms and critical pathways for patients with entry level disease. In addition, they can measure patient access to healthcare and the appropriateness of care. It is important for these databases to appropriately adjust for preoperative risk factors that may influence outcome. Outcome in most of the databases is measured by mortality, but morbidity, functional status, quality of life, cost of care, length of stay, return to work, and patient satisfaction are also important outcomes. Factors that can influence the quality of the outcome data are the methods by which the data are collected, standardization of definitions, the currentness of the database, adequate numbers of patients and outcomes, and appropriate analytic techniques. It is important to feed back the data to the healthcare providers in a timely enough fashion so that processes and structures of care can be modified to improve treatment and results. The reliability of the databases and the validity must be substantiated for the healthcare provider to have confidence in the database.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8526678     DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00796-N

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  3 in total

1.  Cost of and access to surgical care: how much, and how far?

Authors:  Philip P Goodney
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  A decade's experience with quality improvement in cardiac surgery using the Veterans Affairs and Society of Thoracic Surgeons national databases.

Authors:  F L Grover; A L Shroyer; K Hammermeister; F H Edwards; T B Ferguson; S W Dziuban; J C Cleveland; R E Clark; G McDonald
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The feasibility of using automated data to assess guideline-concordant care for schizophrenia.

Authors:  T J Hudson; R R Owen; A E Lancaster; L Mason
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.460

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.