Literature DB >> 8526578

Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in the male adult: the gold standard? A multicenter controlled trial in 1578 patients.

J M Hay1, M J Boudet, A Fingerhut, J Poucher, H Hennet, E Habib, M Veyrières, Y Flamant.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hernia repair is the second most frequently performed operation in France and in the United States, the prevalence being 36 for every 1000 males. Lowering the recurrence rate by 1% would mean 1000 fewer operations for hernia repair per year in France.
METHODS: Between 1983 and 1989, 1578 adult males with a total of 1706 nonrecurrent inguinal hernias were prospectively and randomly allotted to undergo either a Bassini's repair, Cooper's ligament, or Shouldice repair with polypropylene or a Shouldice repair with stainless steel for determination of which technique was associated with the lowest recurrence rate. Fifty-nine hernia repairs were withdrawn after inclusion. Of the 1647 remaining hernias, 52.2% were indirect, 25.6% were direct, and 23.2% were combined. Patients were seen every 6 months for 3 years and then every year. Median follow-up was 5 years 8 months (range, 3 months-8.5 years).
RESULTS: At 8.5 years, 5.6% of hernias were lost to follow-up. Ninety-seven hernia repairs failed, 50% during the first 2 years. The actuarial recurrence rate was 7.94% at 8.5 years. The Shouldice repair (stainless steel or polypropylene) was associated with fewer recurrences (6.1%) than either the Bassini's (8.6%) or Cooper's ligament repair (11.2%) technique (p < 0.001). This difference remained significant even when the maximal bias test was used. Fewer recurrences (5.9%) were observed with the stainless steel wire Shouldice repair than with polypropylene version (6.5%), but the difference was not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Shouldice hernia repair provides the patient with the best chances of nonrecurrence regardless of the anatomical type of hernia. The Shouldice hernia repair should be the gold standard for inguinal hernia repair in men and serves as the basis for comparison with all other techniques, be they prosthetic or laparoscopic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8526578      PMCID: PMC1235020          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199512000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  33 in total

1.  Ten year statistical study of inguinal hernias. A comparison of the rate of recurrence following repair by the Halsted 1 and other operations.

Authors:  J J CLEAR
Journal:  AMA Arch Surg       Date:  1951-01

2.  Must we specialize herniorrhaphy for better results?

Authors:  M Deysine; H S Soroff
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Revisiting the recurrent groin hernia.

Authors:  A G Greenburg
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  The anatomy and repair of inguinal hernias.

Authors:  J L Madden; S Hakim; A B Agorogiannis
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Inguinal and femoral hernioplasty.

Authors:  K Halverson; C B McVay
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1970-08

6.  Causes of recurrence after inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  R W Postlethwait
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Cooper ligament repair: an update.

Authors:  J Barbier; M Carretier; J P Richer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  An anterior transversalis fascia repair for adult inguinal hernias.

Authors:  S Berliner; L Burson; P Katz; L Wise
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Factors associated with early discharge after inguinal hernia repair in 500 consecutive unselected patients. French Associations for Surgical Research.

Authors:  B Millat; A Fingerhut; M Gignoux; J M Hay
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Preliminary results of a prospective randomized study of Cooper's ligament versus Shouldice herniorrhaphy technique.

Authors:  R G Panos; D E Beck; J E Maresh; F J Harford
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992-10
View more
  31 in total

1.  Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: where are we now?

Authors:  D C Brooks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Does every hernia demand a mesh repair? A critical review.

Authors:  V Schumpelick
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Causes of recurrences after open inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  D Ashrafi; M Siddaiah-Subramanya; B Memon; M A Memon
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Long-term follow-up after Lichtenstein hernioplasty in a general surgical unit.

Authors:  L Verstraete; H Swannet
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 5.  Inguinal hernia repair: current surgical techniques.

Authors:  R Bittner; J Schwarz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Canadian Association of General Surgeons and American College of Surgeons evidence-based reviews in surgery. 26. Watchful waiting versus repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men.

Authors:  Jeffrey Barkun; Amy Neville; G William N Fitzgerald; Demetrius Litwin
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Laparoscopic mesh versus open preperitoneal mesh versus conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair: a randomized multicenter trial (SCUR Hernia Repair Study).

Authors:  B Johansson; B Hallerbäck; H Glise; B Anesten; S Smedberg; J Román
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Physiological repair of inguinal hernia: a new technique (study of 860 patients).

Authors:  M P Desarda
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Different methods of hernia repair.

Authors:  R H Rutledge
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Chronic pain after hernia repair: a randomized trial comparing Shouldice, Lichtenstein and TAPP.

Authors:  Jörg Köninger; Jens Redecke; Michael Butters
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.