Literature DB >> 8526292

Age-related differences in mandibular ramus growth: a histologic study.

M G Hans1, D H Enlow, R Noachtar.   

Abstract

Histologic reconstructions of remodeling variations of the mandibular ramus are demonstrated. This is significant because morphogenic relationships between the ramus and corpus establish mandibular arch position. Ground and polished microscopic sections were obtained from the ramus of 30 well-preserved human mandibles, dental age 1 to 13 years. The distribution of the various types of endosteal and periosteal bone tissues and resorptive versus depository surfaces was recorded. Fourteen of the 30 specimens and the majority of the mandibles at all ages examined exhibited the classic pattern of deposition and resorption (Type A or classic pattern) described by Enlow. Nine mandibles followed a second variation (Type B or vertical variation) involving a gonial angle alignment change. Seven followed a pattern of deposition and resorption similar to what Björk might have called a forward rotating pattern (Type C or rotation variation). The differences in these patterns are large enough to suggest that a common description of one pattern of remodeling for all mandibles is incomplete. Unfortunately, the process of mandibular growth and remodeling does not appear to correlate well with dental age and the basis for changes in patterns may be more complex than first imagined. If temporal differences exist, they are not related directly to dental development. In theory, the differences in pattern are great enough to influence the outcome of mandibular orthopedic treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8526292     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0335:ADIMRG>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  8 in total

1.  Growing the mandible: role of the periosteum and its cells.

Authors:  Pannee Ochareon; Susan W Herring
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Panoramic Radiographic Relationship of the Mandibular Foramen to the Anterior Border of the Ramus and Occlusal Plane as an Aid in Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block.

Authors:  Esshagh Lasemi; Mohammad Hosein Kalantar Motamedi; Ahmad Reza Talaeipour; Shahrouz Shafaeifard; Mohamad Javad Kharrazi Fard; Fina Navi; Reza Lasemi; Zahra Zardi; Farhad Alipanah
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2019

3.  Congenital and acquired mandibular asymmetry: Mapping growth and remodeling in 3 dimensions.

Authors:  R Christian Solem; Antonio Ruellas; Joni L Ricks-Oddie; Katherine Kelly; Snehlata Oberoi; Janice Lee; Arthur Miller; Lucia Cevidanes
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 4.  Reconstruction options in pediatric population with hemi or total mandibulectomy defects: A systematic review.

Authors:  Adity Bansal; Shakil Ahmed Nagori; Ashi Chug; Ashutosh Dixit; Rebecca Chowdhry; Srinivas Gosla Reddy
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-03-16

5.  Postnatal changes in the growth dynamics of the human face revealed from bone modelling patterns.

Authors:  Cayetana Martinez-Maza; Antonio Rosas; Manuel Nieto-Díaz
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Mandibular rotation during the transitional dentition.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ueno; Rolf G Behrents; Donald R Oliver; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  A three-dimensional statistical shape model of the growing mandible.

Authors:  C Klop
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The aponeurotic tension model of craniofacial growth in man.

Authors:  Richard G Standerwick; W Eugene Roberts
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2009-05-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.