Literature DB >> 8525426

Comparative evaluation of bioassay and ELISA for detection of Japanese encephalitis virus in field collected mosquitos.

A Gajanana1, R Rajendran, V Thenmozhi, P P Samuel, T F Tsai, R Reuben.   

Abstract

Comparative evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and bioassay (virus isolation in Toxorhynchites splendens larvae and identification by immunofluorescence test using virus specific monoclonal antibody) was carried out in order to define a suitable strategy for monitoring Japanese encephalitis virus infection in field mosquitos. A total of 8,850 adult female mosquitos in 177 pools (Culex tritaeniorhynchus 91, Cx. vishnui 59 and Cx. fuscocephala 27) collected from an endemic area of Tamil Nadu were examined by both the techniques. In ELISA, 9 pools which had optical densities (OD) equal to the mean of normal infected pools plus > or = 4 standard deviations (SD) mean considered positive and all of them were virus positive by the bioassay also. Sixty-five pools had OD = Mean + 2-3 SD and 103 pools had OD = Mean + < 2 SD of normal pools. From these groups, 12 (18.5%) and 8 (7.8%) pools respectively were found to be virus positive by the bioassay. In total 29 (16%) pools were positive by the bioassay as against 9 (5%) by ELISA. This study demonstrated that the bioassay is sensitive for estimation of true positives and ELISA is a rapid screening system. A protocol has now been developed for surveillance in which field pools are first screened by ELISA and only those with OD = Mean + > or 2 SD are assayed in Toxorhynchites. By excluding a large majority of pools with low OD (Mean + < 2 SD), which are likely to yield to only a small percentage of true positives, the cost, time and labor involved are greatly reduced.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8525426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health        ISSN: 0125-1562            Impact factor:   0.267


  6 in total

1.  Entomological investigations into an epidemic of Japanese encephalitis (JE) in northern districts of West Bengal, India (2011-2012).

Authors:  T Mariappan; P Philip Samuel; V Thenmozhi; R Paramasivan; Puran Kumar Sharma; Asit Kumar Biswas; B K Tyagi
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Japanese encephalitis in India.

Authors:  R Reuben; A Gajanana
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 3.  Japanese viral encephalitis.

Authors:  S V Tiroumourougane; P Raghava; S Srinivasan
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Epidemiological concordance of Japanese encephalitis virus infection among mosquito vectors, amplifying hosts and humans in India.

Authors:  J Borah; P Dutta; S A Khan; J Mahanta
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 4.434

5.  Seasonal abundance & role of predominant Japanese encephalitis vectors Culex tritaeniorhynchus & Cx. gelidus Theobald in Cuddalore district, Tamil Nadu.

Authors:  D Ramesh; M Muniaraj; P Philip Samuel; V Thenmozhi; A Venkatesh; J Nagaraj; B K Tyagi
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Comparison of β-Propiolactone and Formalin Inactivation on Antigenicity and Immune Response of West Nile Virus.

Authors:  Pritom Chowdhury; Rashmee Topno; Siraj A Khan; Jagadish Mahanta
Journal:  Adv Virol       Date:  2015-08-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.