Literature DB >> 8524602

Motor recovery of patients presenting with motor paralysis and sensory sparing following cervical spinal cord injuries.

S Katoh1, W S el Masry.   

Abstract

We studied the neurological progress of 21 consecutive patients with cervical spinal cord injuries, presenting with sensory sparing but with complete motor paralysis below the level of their injury (Frankel B). All patients were admitted within 48 h of injury and treated conservatively with 6 weeks of bedrest and traction, followed by 6 weeks of bracing. The follow-up period was more than 1 year (49.6 months on average). Despite the initial absence of motor power in the lower limbs, seven patients recovered significant motor power and were able to walk. The preservation of pinprick sensation between the level of the injury and the sacral dermatomes was the best prognostic indicator for useful motor recovery with 75% of the patients regaining the ability to walk. This pattern of sensory sparing predicted a statistically significant better motor outcome than other patterns of sensory sparing. Although 50% of patients with no sacral sensation and/or with anal sensation on rectal examination recovered motor power, this recovery was functional in only one out of eight patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8524602     DOI: 10.1038/sc.1995.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paraplegia        ISSN: 0031-1758


  10 in total

1.  From the age of the pyramids to the superfast world--what has changed in the management of spinal injuries?

Authors:  Sreedhar Kolli; Clive Inman; J Chowdhury
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.659

2.  Optimization of the mean arterial pressure and timing of surgical decompression in traumatic spinal cord injury: a retrospective study.

Authors:  A Dakson; D Brandman; G Thibault-Halman; S D Christie
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 3.  Traumatic spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  Naveen Kumar; Aheed Osman; J R Chowdhury
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-07-01

4.  International Spinal Cord Injury: Spinal Interventions and Surgical Procedures Basic Data set.

Authors:  M F Dvorak; E Itshayek; M G Fehlings; A R Vaccaro; P C Wing; F Biering-Sorensen; V K Noonan
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 5.  Who is going to walk? A review of the factors influencing walking recovery after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Giorgio Scivoletto; Federica Tamburella; Letizia Laurenza; Monica Torre; Marco Molinari
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Feasibility of visual instrumented movement feedback therapy in individuals with motor incomplete spinal cord injury walking on a treadmill.

Authors:  Daniel Schliessmann; Christian Schuld; Matthias Schneiders; Steffen Derlien; Maria Glöckner; Till Gladow; Norbert Weidner; Rüdiger Rupp
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Induction of central nervous system plasticity by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to promote sensorimotor recovery in incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Peter H Ellaway; Natalia Vásquez; Michael Craggs
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-20

8.  Digital rectal examination for initial assessment of the multi-injured patient: Can we depend on it?

Authors:  Rebecka Ahl; Louis Riddez; Shahin Mohseni
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2016-07-15

9.  Degree of Contribution of Motor and Sensory Scores to Predict Gait Ability in Patients With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Jinkyoo Moon; Junghoon Yu; Jaewoo Choi; MinYoung Kim; Kyunghoon Min
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2017-12-28

10.  Spinal cord injury: is monitoring from the injury site the future?

Authors:  Samira Saadoun; Marios C Papadopoulos
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 9.097

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.