Literature DB >> 8523088

Response of brain tumors to chemotherapy, evaluated in a clinically relevant xenograft model.

L White1, K Sterling-Levis, R Fisher, V Tobias.   

Abstract

Chemotherapy for brain tumors remains unsatisfactory. Despite increasing participation in clinical trials, there is a clear need for pre-clinical models. Heterotransplantation of surgical specimens directly into the anterior chamber of the nude mouse eye has been demonstrated to produce evaluable xenografts. Drug access in this model is considered to mimic the blood-brain barrier. Five clinical specimens in 3 children with primitive neuroectodermal tumor/medulloblastoma were the sources of 293 intraocular xenografts (5 cohorts by source). Each tumor-bearing mouse received 1 of 5 drugs or normal saline, by intraperitoneal injection, weekly for 5 weeks. Response was monitored for up to 22 weeks, using a staging system which estimates the proportion of the anterior chamber filled by tumor. Results were analysed both as response rates (shrinkage in excess of 50%) at the conclusion of the treatment course and as time to tumor progression by the life table method. Comparison of response rates within cohorts by source of xenografts (exact chi-square test for overall and 2-sided Fisher's exact test for paired comparisons) indicated cyclophosphamide to be the most effective single agent. In logrank analyses cyclophosphamide achieved significantly longer delays to progression than all other drugs in one cohort and longer delays than all but diaziquone in 2 other cohorts. The intraocular xenograft model is a clinically relevant system for the study of therapeutic agents in brain tumors. The effectiveness of intensive dosage cyclophosphamide in a model dependent on access across the blood-aqueous barrier is important and consistent with recent clinical data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8523088     DOI: 10.1007/bf01054721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  41 in total

Review 1.  Do anticancer agents reach the tumor target in the human brain?

Authors:  M G Donelli; M Zucchetti; M D'Incalci
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures.

Authors:  S M Hsu; L Raine; H Fanger
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 2.479

3.  High-dose carboplatin in combination with etoposide (JET regimen) for childhood brain tumors.

Authors:  M A Castello; A Clerico; G Deb; C Dominici; P Fidani; A Donfrancesco
Journal:  Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  1990

Review 4.  Preirradiation cisplatin and etoposide in the treatment of high-risk medulloblastoma and other malignant embryonal tumors of the central nervous system: a phase II study.

Authors:  E H Kovnar; S J Kellie; M E Horowitz; R A Sanford; J W Langston; R K Mulhern; J J Jenkins; E C Douglass; E E Etcubanas; D L Fairclough
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Treatment of human glioma and medulloblastoma tumor lines in athymic mice with diaziquone and diaziquone-based drug combinations.

Authors:  S C Schold; H S Friedman; T D Bjornsson; D D Bigner
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Human brain tumor xenografts in nude mice as a chemotherapy model.

Authors:  D P Houchens; A A Ovejera; S M Riblet; D E Slagel
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1983-06

7.  Dose-intensive cyclophosphamide with etoposide and vincristine for pediatric solid tumors: a phase I/II pilot study by the Australia and New Zealand Childhood Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  L White; G McCowage; G Kannourakis; V Nayanar; L Colnan; S Kellie; P Shaw; R Seshadri; L Lockwood; K Tiedemann
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  In vitro chemosensitivity of brain tumors to cisplatin and its analogues, iproplatin and carboplatin.

Authors:  P Dodion; C Sanders; P Georges; Y Kenis
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  Comparison of cyclophosphamide and diaziquone in a retinoblastoma xenograft model.

Authors:  L White; C Reed; V Tobias
Journal:  Ophthalmic Paediatr Genet       Date:  1989-06

10.  High-dose cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for recurrent CNS tumors in children.

Authors:  J C Allen; L Helson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  4 in total

1.  Polynuclear platinum anticancer drugs are more potent than cisplatin and induce cell cycle arrest in glioma.

Authors:  Christine Billecke; Susan Finniss; Laura Tahash; Cathie Miller; Tom Mikkelsen; Nicholas P Farrell; Oliver Bögler
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Local interstitial delivery of z-butylidenephthalide by polymer wafers against malignant human gliomas.

Authors:  Horng-Jyh Harn; Shinn-Zong Lin; Po-Cheng Lin; Cyong-Yue Liu; Po-Yen Liu; Li-Fu Chang; Ssu-Yin Yen; Dean-Kuo Hsieh; Fu-Chen Liu; Dar-Fu Tai; Tzyy-Wen Chiou
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Sepia ink oligopeptide induces apoptosis in prostate cancer cell lines via caspase-3 activation and elevation of Bax/Bcl-2 ratio.

Authors:  Fangfang Huang; Zuisu Yang; Di Yu; Jiabin Wang; Rong Li; Guofang Ding
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 6.085

Review 4.  The Molecular Mechanisms of Plant-Derived Compounds Targeting Brain Cancer.

Authors:  Hueng-Chuen Fan; Ching-Shiang Chi; Yu-Kang Chang; Min-Che Tung; Shinn-Zong Lin; Horng-Jyh Harn
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.