Literature DB >> 8523005

Distal stem design and the torsional stability of cementless femoral stems.

J B Kendrick1, P C Noble, H S Tullos.   

Abstract

In cementless hip arthroplasty, the fit between the implant and the endosteal cavity is a critical determinant of implant stability. Although cementless implants may be stabilized through proximal fit within the metaphysis, many surgeons rely on diaphyseal fixation to provide the necessary resistance to rotational forces, especially in revision hip arthroplasty. The cross-sectional design of the femoral stem at the level of the femoral isthmus was investigated with respect to its effect on the rotational stability of the bone-stem interface. Four cross-sectional designs--a fluted stem, a finned stem, a porous-coated stem, and a slotted fluted stem--were implanted in 12 cadaveric femurs and loaded in torsion. A knurled stem, cemented into each specimen at the conclusion of testing, acted as a control stem. The torque required to cause 100 microns of displacement at the bone stem-interface ranged from 13.7 +/- 0.8 N-m with the porous-coated design to 30.1 +/- 3.7 N-m with the fluted design (P < .0001). Intermediate values of 19.5 +/- 1.4 and 19.9 +/- 2.3 N-m were observed with the finned and slotted fluted designs, respectively. In all of the cemented control stems, failure occurred at the bone-cement interface at an average torque of 34.0 +/- 3.0 N-m. Statistical analysis demonstrated that the porous-coated, finned, and slotted fluted designs were all significantly weaker in torsion than the cemented control stem; however, there was no significant difference between the torsional resistance of the solid fluted (unslotted) and cemented stems.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8523005     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(05)80147-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  4 in total

1.  Total hip replacement with an uncemented Wagner cone stem for patients with congenital hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Raúl Torres Claramunt; Fernando Marqués; Alfonso León; Gemma Vilà; Carlos Mestre; Lluís Puig Verdié
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Can a Conical Implant Successfully Address Complex Anatomy in Primary THA? Radiographs and Hip Scores at Early Followup.

Authors:  Quoqiang Zhang; Stuart B Goodman; William J Maloney; James I Huddleston
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  R Michael Meneghini; Nadim J Hallab; Richard A Berger; Joshua J Jacobs; Wayne G Paprosky; Aaron G Rosenberg
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Cementless curved endoprosthesis stem for distal femoral reconstruction in a Chinese population: a combined anatomical & biomechanical study.

Authors:  Xin Hu; Minxun Lu; Yitian Wang; Yang Wen; Linyun Tan; Guifeng Du; Yong Zhou; Yi Luo; Li Min; Chongqi Tu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 2.562

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.