Literature DB >> 8522381

A randomised, multinational study with sequential therapy comparing ciprofloxacin twice daily and ofloxacin once daily.

H Bassaris1, E Akalin, S Calangu, R Kitzes, J Kosmidis, M Milicevic, H Noack, R Raz, E Salewski, M Sukalo.   

Abstract

In a multinational, open, randomised, controlled clinical study, 474 hospitalised patients with moderate or severe infections were treated with sequential regimens of ofloxacin or ciprofloxacin. Ofloxacin 400 mg once daily or ciprofloxacin 200 mg twice daily were given intravenously for at least 3 days followed by oral treatment with ofloxacin 400 mg once daily or ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily. Overall cure rates of 86.8% (85.7%) in the ofloxacin group and 89.6 (89.5%) in the ciprofloxacin group were achieved in the intention-to-treat analysis (per protocol analysis). The overall bacteriological response rate (ofloxacin 89.5%, ciprofloxacin 89.0%) was comparable to the clinical cure rate. Both drugs were well tolerated and adverse events were rarely observed. It is concluded that ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin can be used successfully in the treatment of hospitalised patients with aerobic gram-positive and gram-negative infections. Ofloxacin has the advantage of a once-daily regimen, compared to the twice-daily regimen with ciprofloxacin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8522381     DOI: 10.1007/bf01781203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  14 in total

Review 1.  Quinolone antimicrobial agents: adverse effects and bacterial resistance.

Authors:  J S Wolfson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Oral ciprofloxacin vs parenteral cefotaxime in the treatment of difficult skin and skin structure infections. A multicenter trial.

Authors:  L O Gentry; C H Ramirez-Ronda; E Rodriguez-Noriega; H Thadepalli; P L del Rosal; C Ramirez
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1989-11

3.  Test statistics and sample size formulae for comparative binomial trials with null hypothesis of non-zero risk difference or non-unity relative risk.

Authors:  C P Farrington; G Manning
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Psychotoxic effects of ofloxacin.

Authors:  M Zaudig; M von Bose; M M Weber; D Bremer; W Zieglgänsberger
Journal:  Pharmacopsychiatry       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 5.788

5.  Use of ciprofloxacin in biliary sepsis.

Authors:  C J Chrysanthopoulos; A T Skoutelis; J C Starakis; A Arvaniti; H P Bassaris
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 6.  Safety of ciprofloxacin. A review.

Authors:  V Rahm; P Schacht
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis Suppl       Date:  1989

Review 7.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  K Vance-Bryan; D R Guay; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Fleroxacin versus ofloxacin in patients with complicated urinary tract infection: a controlled clinical study.

Authors:  K G Naber; G Sigl
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1993-03-22       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 9.  Role of quinolones in the treatment of bronchopulmonary infections, particularly pneumococcal and community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  J P Thys; F Jacobs; B Byl
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  A comparative evaluation of oral ofloxacin versus intravenous cefotaxime therapy for serious skin and skin structure infections.

Authors:  L O Gentry; G Rodriguez-Gomez; B J Zeluff; A Khoshdel; M Price
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1989-12-29       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Ciprofloxacin. An updated review of its pharmacology, therapeutic efficacy and tolerability.

Authors:  R Davis; A Markham; J A Balfour
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 9.546

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.