Literature DB >> 8522084

Payment and attendance at general practice preventive health examinations.

B Christensen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study's purpose was to determine how conditions of payment influence attendance at preventive health examinations.
METHODS: A multi-practice study of 65 general practitioners (GPs) was conducted in two areas in the county of Aarhus, Denmark. The GPs invited 2,452 men aged 40-49 to a preventive health examination for coronary heart disease (CHD). The examination was free in one area but cost $40 in the other area. A risk profile was estimated, based on a summation of points for risk factors for CHD, including blood pressure, serum cholesterol, smoking behavior, body mass index, and family history of CHD.
RESULTS: Attendance at the examinations was 37% in the required payment area and 66% in the free area. Of the total attenders, 13% had an increased risk of CHD. A slight but significant tendency, a lower risk for developing CHD, existed among attenders who paid for the examination.
CONCLUSION: A requirement for payment for health examination leads to fewer patients obtaining examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8522084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Med        ISSN: 0742-3225            Impact factor:   1.756


  6 in total

1.  Health-care utilization among empty-nesters in the rural area of a mountainous county in China.

Authors:  Li-Juan Liu; Xun Sun; Chun-Li Zhang; Qiang Guo
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 2.  How does copayment for health care services affect demand, health and redistribution? A systematic review of the empirical evidence from 1990 to 2011.

Authors:  Astrid Kiil; Kurt Houlberg
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-08-29

3.  Improving attendance for cardiovascular risk assessment in Australian general practice: an RCT of a monetary incentive for patients.

Authors:  Nigel Stocks; James Allan; Oliver Frank; Sue Williams; Philip Ryan
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 4.  Are interventions to increase the uptake of screening for cardiovascular disease risk factors effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  A T Cheong; S M Liew; E M Khoo; N F Mohd Zaidi; K Chinna
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Barriers and facilitators to participation in a health check for cardiometabolic diseases in primary care: A systematic review.

Authors:  Anne-Karien M de Waard; Per E Wändell; Martin J Holzmann; Joke C Korevaar; Monika Hollander; Carl Gornitzki; Niek J de Wit; François G Schellevis; Christos Lionis; Jens Søndergaard; Bohumil Seifert; Axel C Carlsson
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 7.804

6.  Effectiveness of an Out-of-Pocket Cost Removal Intervention on Health Check Attendance in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroshi Murayama; Yuta Takahashi; Setaro Shimada
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.