Literature DB >> 8521887

Determination of prostate gland volume by transrectal ultrasound: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens.

J M Wolff1, W Boeckmann, P Mattelaer, S Handt, G Adam, G Jakse.   

Abstract

Estimation of the prostate gland volume employing transrectal ultrasound provides important additional information in patients with benign and malignant diseases of the prostate. Twenty-five patients underwent transrectal ultrasound of the prostate prior to radical prostatectomy for organ-confined cancer of the prostate. The prostate gland volume was calculated employing two different methods. The prostate specimen weights were compared with the results of each of the volume estimation method. The prolate ellipse formula, widely used as an alternative to planimetry, demonstrated a correlation coefficient of r2 = 0.831. However, a variation of the prolate ellipse formula expressed as (width x width x height) x pi/6, which is easier to perform as described by Terris and Stamey, exhibited a correlation coefficient of r2 = 0.829. It appears to be a reliable means of estimating prostate gland volume, especially in cases in whom the original formula is difficult to apply.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8521887     DOI: 10.1159/000475012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  8 in total

1.  PSA density is superior than PSA and Gleason score for adverse pathologic features prediction in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Petros Perimenis
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Validation of supra-pubic ultrasonography for preoperative prostate volume measurement in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Kalisya Malemo; Moses Galukande; Michael Hawkes; Sam Bugeza; K Nyavandu; Sam Kaggwa
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  PSA density versus risk stratification for lymphadenectomy-making decision in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Petros Perimenis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Clinical and pathological variables that predict changes in tumour grade after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Petros Perimenis
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Parameters predicting postoperative unilateral disease in patients with unilateral prostate cancer in diagnostic biopsy: a rationale for selecting hemiablative focal therapy candidates.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Petros Perimenis
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  How Accurately Can Prostate Gland Imaging Measure the Prostate Gland Volume? Results of a Systematic Review.

Authors:  David R H Christie; Christopher F Sharpley
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2019-03-03

7.  Prostate volume measurement by multiparametric magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound: comparison with surgical specimen weight.

Authors:  Tatiana Martins; Thais Caldara Mussi; Ronaldo Hueb Baroni
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-01-31

8.  Evaluating PSA Density as a Predictor of Biochemical Failure after Radical Prostatectomy: Results of a Prospective Study after a Median Follow-Up of 36 Months.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Petros Perimenis
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2013-05-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.