J P Mulhall1, S G Gabram, L M Jacobs. 1. Department of Urology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Severe blunt testicular trauma is an infrequently reported consequence of injury, yet it is associated with significant sequelae. This case series evaluates the characteristics of patients with severe blunt testicular trauma, assesses the role of ultrasonography in their management, and offers an evaluation algorithm for use by both emergency and urology personnel. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of ten patients who had severe blunt testicular injuries referred for urologic evaluation over a seven-year period at a level 1 trauma center. Attention was focused on ultrasonographic results, operative findings, and testicular salvage rates. RESULTS: With the exception of two motorcycle crash victims, patients presented in a delayed fashion (mean 3.5 days; range 1-5 days). Most (6/10) patients had true testicular rupture, all were explored urgently, and there was a 100% testicular salvage rate. Of the eight patients who had preoperative ultrasonographic examination, two were reported to show testicular rupture, but on exploration only one in fact had a tunica albuginea tear. Six patients had ultrasonographic examinations that revealed nonspecific abnormalities but failed to show testicular rupture; three had testicular rupture. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonography cannot be relied on to accurately diagnose rupture of the testis in high-risk patients. However, testicular rupture is universally associated with an abnormal ultrasonography scan, albeit commonly yielding nonspecific findings. A high level of suspicion is mandatory with high-energy transfer mechanisms. Since a significant delay in presentation is not unusual, early exploration is warranted in the setting of high risk and provides an excellent chance of testicular salvage. Injuries associated with normal testicular ultrasonography may be managed conservatively.
OBJECTIVE: Severe blunt testicular trauma is an infrequently reported consequence of injury, yet it is associated with significant sequelae. This case series evaluates the characteristics of patients with severe blunt testicular trauma, assesses the role of ultrasonography in their management, and offers an evaluation algorithm for use by both emergency and urology personnel. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of ten patients who had severe blunt testicular injuries referred for urologic evaluation over a seven-year period at a level 1 trauma center. Attention was focused on ultrasonographic results, operative findings, and testicular salvage rates. RESULTS: With the exception of two motorcycle crash victims, patients presented in a delayed fashion (mean 3.5 days; range 1-5 days). Most (6/10) patients had true testicular rupture, all were explored urgently, and there was a 100% testicular salvage rate. Of the eight patients who had preoperative ultrasonographic examination, two were reported to show testicular rupture, but on exploration only one in fact had a tunica albuginea tear. Six patients had ultrasonographic examinations that revealed nonspecific abnormalities but failed to show testicular rupture; three had testicular rupture. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonography cannot be relied on to accurately diagnose rupture of the testis in high-risk patients. However, testicular rupture is universally associated with an abnormal ultrasonography scan, albeit commonly yielding nonspecific findings. A high level of suspicion is mandatory with high-energy transfer mechanisms. Since a significant delay in presentation is not unusual, early exploration is warranted in the setting of high risk and provides an excellent chance of testicular salvage. Injuries associated with normal testicular ultrasonography may be managed conservatively.