Literature DB >> 8520184

Cumulative birth rates following cryopreservation of all embryos in stimulated in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles.

C Bergh1, C Werner, L Nilsson, L Hamberger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To cryopreserve all good-quality embryos available after IVF is one way to avoid an impending hyperstimulation and a more attractive alternative to a couple than cancellation of the cycle. At Sahlgrenska University Hospital this method has been practiced since 1991. The aim of this study was to assess the success rate (defined as childbirth per couple) after IVF treatment including one stimulated cycle, resulting in cryopreservation of all good-quality embryos available, followed by replacement of frozen/thawed embryos in one or more natural cycles.
DESIGN: A cohort of 32 women undergoing one stimulation for IVF between January 1991 and December 1993 where all good-quality embryos were cryopreserved and transferred in a later spontaneous cycle were studied retrospectively. The cumulative childbirth rate per couple was calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 28 women underwent a total of 45 transfers with frozen-thawed embryos. In 4 women no transfer has taken place so far. The clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was 33% (15/45) and per patient 54% (15/28). Three spontaneous abortions occurred giving a cumulative childbirth rate per patient of 39% (11/28). In addition, 6 out of the 28 women still have embryos left in the freezer.
CONCLUSION: Cryopreservation of all good-quality embryos available after IVF is a highly effective alternative to cancellation of a cycle when there is impending hyperstimulation. The use of this approach results in a cumulative childbirth rate per couple of at least 39%. Since only one stimulation was performed, it also seems to be cost effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8520184     DOI: 10.1007/BF02211797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  12 in total

1.  Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment.

Authors:  F Puissant; M Van Rysselberge; P Barlow; J Deweze; F Leroy
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a current survey.

Authors:  J G Schenker; D Weinstein
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Factors predicting outcome in 215 consecutive thawed embryo replacements.

Authors:  S Anderson-Sykes; B C Dunphy; H A Pattinson; J Jarrell; X Q Zhang
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in novel reproductive technologies: prevention and treatment.

Authors:  D Navot; P A Bergh; N Laufer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Human embryo features that influence the success of cryopreservation with the use of 1,2 propanediol.

Authors:  B Lassalle; J Testart; J P Renard
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  In-vitro fertilization in infertile women with the polycystic ovarian syndrome.

Authors:  P O Dale; T Tanbo; T Abyholm
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Sperm characteristics and outcome of human assisted fertilization by subzonal insemination and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  G Palermo; H Joris; M P Derde; M Camus; P Devroey; A Van Steirteghem
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Does elective cryopreservation of all embryos from women at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome reduce the incidence of the condition?

Authors:  I Wada; P L Matson; S A Troup; D R Morroll; L Hunt; B A Lieberman
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1993-03

9.  Collection of human oocytes by the use of sonography.

Authors:  M Wikland; L Nilsson; R Hansson; L Hamberger; P O Janson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Outcome of thaw embryo transfer after cryopreservation of all embryos in patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Authors:  H A Pattinson; M Hignett; B C Dunphy; J A Fleetham
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of early pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after frozen and fresh embryo transfer in ART cycles.

Authors:  Abbas Aflatoonian; Fatemeh Mansoori Moghaddam; Mehri Mashayekhy; Farnaz Mohamadian
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Low birth weight: is it related to assisted reproductive technology or underlying infertility?

Authors:  Laxmi A Kondapalli; Alfredo Perales-Puchalt
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Chromosome abnormalities and viability of vitrified eight-cell mouse embryos at presence of two different cryoprotectants at different storage durations.

Authors:  Shabnam Zarei Moradi; Anahita Mohseni Meybodi; Hamid Gourabi; Hossein Mozdarani; Zahra Mansouri
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.479

4.  Effects of laser-assisted hatching and exposure time to vitrification solution on mouse embryo development.

Authors:  Hye Jin Kim; Sung Baek Park; Jung Bo Yang; Young Bae Choi; Ki Hwan Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2017-12-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.