Literature DB >> 8518864

Magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of bladder cancer.

R Persad1, J Kabala, D Gillatt, B Penry, J C Gingell, P J Smith.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were performed on 55 bladder cancer patients on whom clinicopathological staging was available from transurethral resection and cystectomy specimens. The overall accuracy of MRI scanning in this group was 84%, although true concordance rates are debatable without open surgical correlation. In the subgroup of 25 patients who had accurate open surgical correlation (from cystectomy, laparotomy or post mortem) the concordance rate was 76% with MRI. Errors occurred mainly in the T3 group of tumours, with 2 being overstaged and 2 being understaged out of a total of 12 in the open surgical correlation group (66% accuracy). Difficulties were also encountered in staging tumours at the bladder base, with an error rate of 22% (2 of 9) for T4 tumours in this area. With regard to lymph node staging there was a 100% (5 of 5) specificity in defining pathologically involved nodes but there was a false negative rate of 15% (3 of 19). Although it has many advantages over CT scanning, MRI produces a significant error rate in terms of over- and under-staging invasive tumours. There are difficulties associated with detecting minimal involvement of adjacent organs and lymph nodes as well as determining the exact depth of muscle penetration. Improvements may come in the future with the use of contrast enhancement agents such as gadolinium as well as more advanced machines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8518864     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1993.tb16026.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  6 in total

1.  Comparative sensitivity and specificity of imaging modalities in staging bladder cancer prior to radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jack Crozier; Nathan Papa; Marlon Perera; Brian Ngo; Damien Bolton; Shomik Sengupta; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging. Application to family practice.

Authors:  R H Goh; S Somers; E Jurriaans; J Yu
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  FDG-PET for preoperative staging of bladder cancer.

Authors:  O Drieskens; R Oyen; H Van Poppel; Y Vankan; P Flamen; L Mortelmans
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  [Siliconchiptechnology-based MMP-7 analysis in urine: an option for preoperative identification of lymph node metastasis in bladder cancer].

Authors:  T Jäger; S Tschirdewahn; F Vom Dorp; G Piechotta; H Rübben; T Szarvas
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  VI-RADS score system - A primer for urologists.

Authors:  Refky Nicola; Martina Pecoraro; Sara Lucciola; Rodolfo Borges Dos Reis; Yoshifumi Narumi; Valeria Panebianco; Valdair Francisco Muglia
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Pros and cons of radical cystectomy in the treatment of T1G3 bladder cancer.

Authors:  Piyus K Agarwal; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.