Literature DB >> 8518378

Comparison of axillary artery or brachial artery pressure with aortic pressure after cardiopulmonary bypass using a long radial artery catheter.

J O VanBeck1, R D White, J P Abenstein, C J Mullany, T A Orszulak.   

Abstract

Arterial pressure measured in a peripheral artery may significantly underestimate central arterial pressure after discontinuation of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Arterial pressure measured with a 50 cm radial artery catheter advanced into the brachial or axillary artery was compared to ascending aortic pressure in 31 patients before and after discontinuation of CPB. The radial artery catheter extended proximally into the brachial artery in 8/31 patients, and into the axillary artery in 23/31 patients. The patient's age, pre-CPB cardiac ejection fraction, and surgical procedures were similar in both groups. The systolic arterial pressure measured in the ascending aorta was found to be significantly different from that in the axillary artery after CPB, whereas the mean and diastolic pressures were not. The average aorta-to-axillary artery systolic pressure gradient was -3.0 +/- 4.0 mmHg, with no patient having a gradient greater than 10 mmHg. The systolic and mean arterial pressures measured in the ascending aorta were found to be significantly different from that in the brachial artery after discontinuation of CPB, whereas the diastolic pressure was not. The average aorta-to-brachial artery systolic pressure gradient was 6.9 +/- 6.9 mmHg, with 3/8 patients having a gradient greater than 10 mmHg. Long radial artery catheters, placed using the Seldinger technique, provide an accurate estimate of central aortic pressure after CPB when they are advanced into the axillary artery. Sites more distal than the axillary artery may result in significant underestimation of the central aortic pressure in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8518378     DOI: 10.1016/1053-0770(93)90011-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  2 in total

1.  Practical Suitability of a Stand-Alone Oscillometric Central Blood Pressure Monitor: A Review of the Microlife WatchBP Office Central.

Authors:  Willem J Verberk; Hao-Min Cheng; Li-Chih Huang; Chia-Ming Lin; Yao-Pin Teng; Chen-Huan Chen
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-12

2.  Peripheral arterial blood pressure monitoring adequately tracks central arterial blood pressure in critically ill patients: an observational study.

Authors:  Mariano Alejandro Mignini; Enrique Piacentini; Arnaldo Dubin
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.