Literature DB >> 8517565

Does nasotracheal intubation increase complications in patients with skull base fractures?

K J Rhee1, C B Muntz, P J Donald, J M Yamada.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To determine if the complications associated with skull base fractures are increased when nasotracheal intubation is performed in the field.
DESIGN: Retrospective, case-control study over a five-year period.
SETTING: A helicopter service returning to a Level I trauma center. TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: All injured patients treated in the field who had either radiographic or clinical evidence of skull base fractures in whom nasotracheal intubation was attempted (38) compared with all patients with skull base fractures in whom nasotracheal intubation was not attempted (48) and a convenience sample of patients without skull base fractures in whom nasotracheal intubation was attempted (45). Patients with obvious midface motion on initial examination were excluded. Complications of skull base fractures were categorized as cerebral spinal fluid leak of longer than 24 hours and/or meningitis, cranial nerve injury, diabetes insipidus, and intracranial placement of the endotracheal tube.
INTERVENTIONS: Blind nasotracheal intubation was performed by experienced flight nurses.
RESULTS: There were no patients in whom an endotracheal tube was placed intracranially. There was no significant difference in complication rate between the two groups with skull base fractures (with nasotracheal intubation, 24%; 95% confidence interval, 11% to 40%; without nasotracheal intubation, 25%; 95% confidence interval, 14% to 40%). The group without skull base fracture had none of the complications usually associated with skull base fractures.
CONCLUSION: Patients with skull base fracture have a significant complication rate (25%). The complications associated with skull base fractures are not markedly increased by attempts at nasotracheal intubation in the field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8517565     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)80980-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  6 in total

1.  Airway management in maxillofacial trauma: do we really need tracheostomy/submental intubation.

Authors:  Geeta Mittal; Rajinder K Mittal; Sunil Katyal; Sanjeev Uppal; Varun Mittal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-03-15

2.  Submental intubation: our experience.

Authors:  Anuradha Navaneetham; S Vinod Thangaswamy; Naveen Rao
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2010-06-04

3.  Submental intubation versus tracheostomy in maxillofacial fractures.

Authors:  Tarek Abdelzaher Emara; Mohammad Waheed El-Anwar; Tharwat Abdelzaher Omara; Ahmed Anany; Islam Abdelrahman Elawa; Mohamed Mohamed Rabea
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-05-16

4.  Airway management using transmylohyoid oroendotracheal (submental) intubation in maxillofacial trauma.

Authors:  Imran Khan; Deborah Sybil; Anurag Singh; Tarun Aggarwal; Rizwan Khan
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Dec

5.  Submental Intubation in Patients with Complex Maxillofacial Injuries.

Authors:  Yuseon Cheong; Seong Sik Kang; Minsoo Kim; Hee Jeong Son; Jaewoo Park; Jeong-Mo Kim
Journal:  J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2016-09-30

6.  Nasotracheal Intubation After Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Case Report.

Authors:  Kanta Kido; Takumi Sato; Hitoshi Miyashita
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.