Literature DB >> 8517104

Direct vascular effect of ropivacaine in femoral artery and vein of the dog.

K Nakamura1, H Toda, M Kakuyama, M Nishiwada, M Yamamoto, Y Hatano, K Mori.   

Abstract

A study was conducted to examine the direct vascular effect of ropivacaine, in comparison with the effect of bupivacaine and lidocaine. Changes in tension induced by ropivacaine (10(-5)-3 x 10(-3) mol l-1) and lidocaine (10(-5)-10(-2) mol l-1) were examined cumulatively in vascular rings of dog femoral artery and vein under basal tension, or in those which had been precontracted with phenylephrine submaximally in Krebs' bicarbonate solution at 37 degrees C aerated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 (pH 7.4). The change in tension induced by 10(-2) mol l-1 ropivacaine was tested under basal tension in vascular rings bathed in HEPES buffer (pH 6.8). Ropivacaine induced greater constriction than bupivacaine at concentrations over 10(-3) mol l-1 in vascular rings under basal tension (P < 0.01). The maximal contraction was induced by ropivacaine at 10(-3) mol l-1, averaging 51.5 +/- 2.8% (n = 11) and 27.0 +/- 3.7% (n = 12) of the maximal contraction induced by epinephrine in the artery and vein, respectively, and the contractions induced by ropivacaine at 10(-2) mol l-1 were 16.3 +/- 2.0% (n = 11) and 5.5 +/- 1.1% (n = 9), respectively. Phenylephrine (10(-6) mol l-1)-precontracted artery was contracted significantly by ropivacaine at 3 x 10(-4) mol l-1 and 10(-3) mol l-1, and by bupivacaine at 3 x 10(-4) mol l-1, whereas the phenylephrine (10(-6) mol l-1)-precontracted vein was relaxed by these anesthetics. Lidocaine did not exert constricting effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8517104     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1993.tb03714.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Toxicology of local anesthetics. Clinical, therapeutic and pathological mechanisms].

Authors:  W Zink; B M Graf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Effect of epinephrine on the distribution of ropivacaine and lidocaine using radioactive isotopes in rat maxilla and pulp.

Authors:  Kyohei Fujita; Katsuhisa Sunada
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 3.  Preliminary risk-benefit analysis of ropivacaine in labour and following surgery.

Authors:  I Cederholm
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Benefit-risk assessment of ropivacaine in the management of postoperative pain.

Authors:  Wolfgang Zink; Bernhard M Graf
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  A Comparison of the Dynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Ropivacaine 7.5 mg/mL with and without Epinephrine Used for Epidural Anaesthesia in Urological Surgery.

Authors:  Charles E Pither; Britt-Marie Emanuelsson; Håkan Reventlid; Elizabeth Whitehead
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.859

6.  Comparative evaluation of ropivacaine and lignocaine with ropivacaine, lignocaine and clonidine combination during peribulbar anaesthesia for phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

Authors:  Balbir Khan; Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa; Ravi Vohra; Sukhwinder Singh; Rajwinder Kaur
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2012-01

7.  The effect of mepivacaine on swine lingual, pulmonary and coronary arteries.

Authors:  Kenichi Satoh; Mami Chikuda; Ayako Ohashi; Miho Kumagai; Masahito Sato; Shigeharu Joh
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Ropivacaine-induced contraction is attenuated by both endothelial nitric oxide and voltage-dependent potassium channels in isolated rat aortae.

Authors:  Seong-Ho Ok; Jeong Yeol Han; Hui-Jin Sung; Seong Min Yang; Jungchul Park; Seong-Chun Kwon; Mun-Jeoung Choi; Ju-Tae Sohn
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Comparison between ropivacaine and bupivacaine in deep topical fornix nerve block anesthesia in patients undergoing cataract surgery by phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Anshika Kashyap; Rahul Varshney; Govind Singh Titiyal; Ajay Kumar Sinha
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  [Amaurosis and contralateral cranial nerve pairs III and VI paralysis after peribulbar block - case report].

Authors:  Fábio Caetano Oliveira Leme; Eduardo Toshiyuki Moro; Alexandre Alberto Fontana Ferraz
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-08-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.