Literature DB >> 8516704

Evaluation of intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring during 100 cervical operations.

N E Epstein1, J Danto, D Nardi.   

Abstract

Continuous intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring during scoliosis surgery, along with improved instrumentation techniques, has contributed to the reduction of neurologic injury from 4-6.9% to 0-0.7%. To assess whether somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring might play a similar role in cervical surgery, the authors compared the morbidity and mortality rates associated with 218 patients who were not monitored and were operated on between 1985-1989 with those found in 100 consecutive somatosensory-evoked potential monitored procedures done from 1989-1991. The cervical procedures were conducted for disc disease, stenosis, spondylosis, and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Eight of 218 unmonitored patients became quadriplegic (3.7%) and 1 died (0.5%); no instances of quadriplegia and no deaths were encountered among the 100 monitored patients. The reduction of neurologic deficit was attributed in part to early somatosensory-evoked potential detection of vascular or mechanical compromise of the spinal cord or nerve roots and to the immediate alteration of anesthetic or surgical technique in response to somatosensory-evoked potential changes, i.e., reversal of systemic or "relative" hypotension, adjustment of operative position, release of distraction, and cessation of manipulation. Continuous intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring also was a practical tool in monitoring cervical surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8516704     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199305000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

1.  Indication and technical implementation of the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgeries-a transnational survey in the German-speaking countries.

Authors:  Sebastian Siller; Constance Raith; Stefan Zausinger; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Andrea Szelenyi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Monitoring rate and predictability of intraoperative monitoring in patients with intradural extramedullary and epidural metastatic spinal tumors.

Authors:  H Kang; H S Gwak; S H Shin; M K Woo; I H Jeong; H Yoo; J W Kwon; S H Lee
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Spinal intradural extramedullary tumors: the value of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring on surgical outcome.

Authors:  Ran Harel; David Schleifer; Shmuel Appel; Moshe Attia; Zvi R Cohen; Nachshon Knoller
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Intraoperative control by somatosensory evoked potentials in the treatment of cervical myeloradiculopathy. Results in 210 cases.

Authors:  C Sebastián; J P Raya; M Ortega; E Olalla; V Lemos; R Romero
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The utility of somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery: how often does it prompt intervention and affect outcome?

Authors:  Michael S Roh; Tracy J Wilson-Holden; Anne M Padberg; Jong-Beom Park; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2007-06-30

6.  Evoked potential monitoring identifies possible neurological injury during positioning for craniotomy.

Authors:  Zirka H Anastasian; Brian Ramnath; Ricardo J Komotar; Jeffrey N Bruce; Michael B Sisti; Edward J Gallo; Ronald G Emerson; Eric J Heyer
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 7.  Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: What Is the Evidence?

Authors:  Remi M Ajiboye; Stephen D Zoller; Akshay Sharma; Gina M Mosich; Austin Drysch; Jesse Li; Tara Reza; Sina Pourtaheri
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.241

8.  A role for motor and somatosensory evoked potentials during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for patients without myelopathy: Analysis of 57 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Risheng Xu; Eva K Ritzl; Mohammed Sait; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Timothy F Witham; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-09-30

9.  Routine Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During ACDFs for the Treatment of Spondylotic Myelopathy and Radiculopathy Is Questionable: A Review of 15,395 Cases.

Authors:  Remi M Ajiboye; Anthony D'Oro; Adedayo O Ashana; Rafael A Buerba; Elizabeth L Lord; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang; Sina Pourtaheri
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  The need to add motor evoked potential monitoring to somatosensory and electromyographic monitoring in cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.