Literature DB >> 8516696

Biomechanics of indirect reduction of bone retropulsed into the spinal canal in vertebral fracture.

R M Harrington1, T Budorick, J Hoyt, P A Anderson, A F Tencer.   

Abstract

The biomechanics of indirect reduction of bone fragments retropulsed into the spinal canal in a burst fracture were investigated. In this model, tunnels were created in vertebrae L1 and C5 oriented anterior-to-posterior, allowing access to the posterior longitudinal ligament. A probe containing a load-sensing tip was passed through the tunnel. Both the location of the tip and the load acting on it by posterior deflection of the posterior longitudinal ligament were measured. In the lumbar spine, distraction was applied by spinal instrumentation that also permitted independent kyphotic-lordotic alignment of the vertebrae. In the cervical spine, axial traction was applied through direct loading. Several clinically relevant observations were made. It was not possible to produce an anteriorly directed force in the posterior longitudinal ligament at less than 35% canal occlusion, partly because the posterior longitudinal ligament stands away from the midbody of the vertebra. Distractive forces of up to 150 N were applied in the lumbar spine, which were nearly equal to the tensile breaking strength of the isolated posterior longitudinal ligament. Regardless of the relative sagittal plane angulation of the vertebrae, distraction was the governing factor in generating force in the posterior longitudinal ligament. Because positioning the vertebrae in lordosis before applying distraction significantly slackens the posterior longitudinal ligament, it is suggested that distraction be applied before angular positioning of the vertebrae is performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8516696     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199305000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Posterior distraction forces of the posterior longitudinal ligament stratified according to vertebral level.

Authors:  R Shane Tubbs; Marios Loukas; April Phantana-Angkool; Mohammadali M Shoja; Mohammad R Ardalan; Ghaffar Shokouhi; W Jerry Oakes
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  The effect of posterior instrumentation of the spine on canal dimensions and neurological recovery in thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures.

Authors:  S P Mohanty; Shyamasunder N Bhat; C Ishwara-Keerthi
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2011-03-10

3.  Pedicle screw fixation in thoracolumbar and lumbar spine assisted by lateral fluoroscopic imaging: a study to evaluate the accuracy of screw placement.

Authors:  S P Mohanty; S N Bhat; M Pai Kanhangad; G S Gosal
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-08-11

4.  Morphometric study of the posterior longitudinal ligament at the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Céline Salaud; Stéphane Ploteau; Olivier Hamel; Olivier Armstrong; Antoine Hamel
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  INTRAVERTEBRAL EXPANDABLE IMPLANTS IN THORACOLUMBAR VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES.

Authors:  Diogo Filipe Lino Moura; Josué Pereira Gabriel
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 0.683

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.