Literature DB >> 8516334

Change in the signal-response sequence responsible for asymmetric isolation between Drosophila planitibia and Drosophila silvestris.

A Hoikkala1, K Kaneshiro.   

Abstract

Drosophila planitibia and Drosophila silvestris form a species pair that is an example of species diverged through a founder event. These species exhibit asymmetric sexual isolation, courtships between D. planitibia males and D. silvestris females being more successful than courtships between D. silvestris males and D. planitibia females. When analyzing the signal-response courtship sequence in these species, we found that D. silvestris females responded to male circling by standing or preening while D. planitibia females required further signals from the male to stop walking. The main reason for the reduced mating success rate of D. silvestris males with D. planitibia females was that the females responded to male circling by walking and the males did not proceed to the head-under-wings (HUW) position of a walking female. Another critical phase in these courtships was the HUW position in D. silvestris, where males proceeded almost immediately to wing and leg vibration. The courtships between D. planitibia male and D. silvestris female proceeded in a signal-response coordination until the male went to the HUW position, where he fanned his wings for too long a period before proceeding to wing and leg vibration. Thus, it seems that the asymmetric isolation between D. planitibia (ancestral species) and D. silvestris (derived species) is mainly due to a loss of transitions in the signal-response chain of D. silvestris. A change in the behavior of the males in the HUW position has caused further isolation between the species in both directions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8516334      PMCID: PMC46813          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.12.5813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  6 in total

1.  Change in a secondary sexual character as evidence of incipient speciation in Drosophila silvestris.

Authors:  H L Carson; P J Bryant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits.

Authors:  R Lande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sexual Isolation Studies in the Species Complex Drosophila Virilis.

Authors:  H D Stalker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1942-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Effect of culture temperature on the production of Marek's disease virus antigens in a chicken lymphoblastoid cell line.

Authors:  K Arita; S Nii
Journal:  Biken J       Date:  1979-03

5.  Discordance of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA phylogenies in Hawaiian Drosophila.

Authors:  R DeSalle; L V Giddings
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Hawaiian courtship songs: evolutionary innovation in communication signals of Drosophila.

Authors:  R R Hoy; A Hoikkala; K Kaneshiro
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-04-08       Impact factor: 47.728

  6 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Role of sexual selection in speciation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Akanksha Singh; Bashisth N Singh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Characterization of a contemporaneous hybrid zone between two darter species (Etheostoma bison and E. caeruleum) in the Buffalo River System.

Authors:  Christen M Bossu; Thomas J Near
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Substrate vibrations during courtship in three Drosophila species.

Authors:  Valerio Mazzoni; Gianfranco Anfora; Meta Virant-Doberlet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Genomic Signatures of Speciation in Sympatric and Allopatric Hawaiian Picture-Winged Drosophila.

Authors:  Lin Kang; Robert Settlage; Wyatt McMahon; Katarzyna Michalak; Hongseok Tae; Harold R Garner; Elizabeth A Stacy; Donald K Price; Pawel Michalak
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 3.416

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.