Literature DB >> 8515759

Muscle fiber conduction velocity changes with length.

J V Trontelj1.   

Abstract

While recording activity from individual muscle fibers by single fiber EMG (SFEMG), stimulated either through their axons or directly, the length of the recorded muscle fiber was changed--stretched or made shorter--by manipulating the recording needle or by passive joint movements. This resulted in significant changes of latency corresponding to an increase in propagation velocity on shortening of the muscle fiber and to a slowing of its lengthening. The maximum increase in velocity was estimated to 33% and slowing to about 22%. These length-dependent changes of muscle fiber propagation velocity are suggested to contribute to the supernormal phase of propagation velocity recovery function and to be responsible for an important part of the myogenic, interdischarge interval-dependent, jitter.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8515759     DOI: 10.1002/mus.880160512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  6 in total

1.  Single motor unit analysis from spatially filtered surface electromyogram signals. Part 2: conduction velocity estimation.

Authors:  E Schulte; D Farina; G Rau; R Merletti; C Disselhorst-Klug
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Increased intensity and reduced frequency of EMG signals from feline self-reinnervated ankle extensors during walking do not normalize excessive lengthening.

Authors:  Annette Pantall; Emma F Hodson-Tole; Robert J Gregor; Boris I Prilutsky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Task-dependent activity of motor unit populations in feline ankle extensor muscles.

Authors:  Emma F Hodson-Tole; Annette Pantall; Huub Maas; Brad Farrell; Robert J Gregor; Boris I Prilutsky
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Lower extremity malalignments and anterior cruciate ligament injury history.

Authors:  Jay Hertel; Jennifer H Dorfman; Rebecca A Braham
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Optimal stimulation settings for CMAP scan registrations.

Authors:  Ellen M Maathuis; Robert D Henderson; Judith Drenthen; Nicole M Hutchinson; Jasper R Daube; Joleen H Blok; Gerhard H Visser
Journal:  J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj       Date:  2012-06-18

Review 6.  Key changes in denervated muscles and their impact on regeneration and reinnervation.

Authors:  Peng Wu; Aditya Chawla; Robert J Spinner; Cong Yu; Michael J Yaszemski; Anthony J Windebank; Huan Wang
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 5.135

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.