Literature DB >> 8515216

Interpretation of low postmortem concentrations of ethanol.

B Levine1, M L Smith, J E Smialek, Y H Caplan.   

Abstract

The interpretation of postmortem blood ethanol concentrations (BAC), especially those less than 0.05 g/dL can be complicated by postmortem ethanol formation. One method used by the toxicologist to respond to this possibility is to analyze multiple specimens for ethanol. Two useful specimens to analyze are vitreous humor and urine, because they are less susceptible to the putrefaction process. A negative vitreous humor and/or urine ethanol would suggest that the measured ethanol resulted from postmortem formation. Data were collected from the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, State of Maryland and the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology on blood specimens with ethanol concentrations less than 0.05 g/dL to develop a reasonable threshold for interpretation in the absence of other specimens. A total of 381 cases with a BAC between 0.01 and 0.04 g/dL were studied over a 2 year period. Urine and vitreous humor specimens were tested where available. At a BAC of 0.01 g/dL, 54% of the cases were associated with a positive vitreous humor and/or urine ethanol concentration. This percentage increased to 63% when BAC equals 0.02 g/dL. Seventy-three percent and 92% of the cases had a positive alternate specimen if the BAC was 0.03 g/dL and 0.04 g/dL, respectively. In addition, 90% of the cases where both vitreous humor and urine were analyzed showed consistent results, that is both specimens were positive or negative. This suggests that in the absence of additional information, a BAC of 0.04 g/dL or higher probably resulted from ethanol consumption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8515216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.832


  6 in total

1.  Alcohol estimation at necropsy: epidemiology, economics, and the elderly.

Authors:  D E Cox; D W Sadler; D J Pounder
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Uncertainty in estimating blood ethanol concentrations by analysis of vitreous humour.

Authors:  A W Jones; P Holmgren
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Assistance of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in the interpretation of postmortem ethanol findings.

Authors:  Hege Krabseth; Jørg Mørland; Gudrun Høiseth
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Practical use of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in postmortem cases as markers of antemortem alcohol ingestion.

Authors:  Gudrun Høiseth; Ritva Karinen; Asbjørg Christophersen; Jørg Mørland
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Was a child poisoned by ethanol? Discrimination between ante-mortem consumption and post-mortem formation.

Authors:  Brice M R Appenzeller; Marc Schuman; Robert Wennig
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Epidemiology of alcohol-related unintentional drowning: is post-mortem ethanol production a real challenge?

Authors:  Tuulia Pajunen; Erkki Vuori; Philippe Lunetta
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2018-11-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.