Literature DB >> 8512762

A comparison of amlodipine with enalapril in the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension.

J Webster1, G Fowler, T A Jeffers, D Lyons, K Witte, W A Crichton, E A Wickham, S S Sanghera, R Cornish, J C Petrie.   

Abstract

1. The safety and efficacy of amlodipine and enalapril were compared in patients with isolated systolic hypertension (supine DBP < 95 mm Hg and supine SBP 160-200 mm Hg). 2. After 2 weeks treatment with placebo 31 patients were randomised by the technique of minimisation in an observer-blind study to receive once daily treatment with either amlodipine (16 patients) or enalapril (15 patients) for 8 weeks. The study design concluded with 2 weeks placebo treatment. In addition to clinic measurements, home blood pressure monitoring (Copal UA-251) was performed during the study. 3. Mean supine systolic blood pressure was reduced from 185 to 164 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 183 to 159 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the difference between the drugs -10.5, 15.3) after 8 weeks treatment. 4. Mean supine diastolic blood pressure was reduced from 86 to 80 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 88 to 80 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the difference between the drugs -4.9, 7.6) after 8 weeks treatment. 5. Home blood pressure recordings confirmed these reductions in blood pressure, although there was no significant difference between treatments for the reductions in blood pressure. 6. Both drugs were reasonably well tolerated. The adverse events occurring most frequently in the amlodipine group were headache (2), peripheral oedema (5) and palpitations (2). The adverse events occurring most frequently in the enalapril group were headache (2), peripheral oedema (2), palpitations (2) and dizziness (3).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8512762      PMCID: PMC1381688          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb04176.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  24 in total

1.  The safety of amlodipine.

Authors:  I Osterloh
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Once daily amlodipine in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  J Webster; O J Robb; T A Jeffers; A K Scott; J C Petrie; H M Towler
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Amlodipine in hypertension: an overview of the clinical dossier.

Authors:  S Julius
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.105

4.  Minimization: a new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups.

Authors:  D R Taves
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Isolated systolic hypertension: data from the European Working Party on High Blood Pressure in the Elderly.

Authors:  K O'Malley; P McCormack; E T O'Brien
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1988-11

6.  Lymphatic contractions.

Authors:  W L Olszewski; A Engeset
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-02-08       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Determinants of isolated systolic hypertension.

Authors:  S V Wilking; A Belanger; W B Kannel; R B D'Agostino; K Steel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-12-16       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Comparative effects of captopril and isosorbide dinitrate on the arterial wall of hypertensive human brachial arteries.

Authors:  M E Safar; S Laurent; J A Bouthier; G M London
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.105

9.  Calcium channel blocking properties of amlodipine in vascular smooth muscle and cardiac muscle in vitro: evidence for voltage modulation of vascular dihydropyridine receptors.

Authors:  R A Burges; D G Gardiner; M Gwilt; A J Higgins; K J Blackburn; S F Campbell; P E Cross; J K Stubbs
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.105

10.  Effects of chronic inhibition of converting enzyme on mechanical and structural properties of arteries in rat renovascular hypertension.

Authors:  B I Levy; J B Michel; J L Salzmann; M Azizi; P Poitevin; M Safar; J P Camilleri
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 17.367

View more
  4 in total

1.  Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of manidipine versus amlodipine in elderly subjects with isolated systolic hypertension: MAISH study.

Authors:  Antonio Coca Payeras; Krzysztof Sladek; Giuseppe Lembo; Marco Alberici
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  Optimal dosage of ACE inhibitors in older patients.

Authors:  B Tomlinson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  Management of isolated systolic hypertension.

Authors:  A Tonkin; L Wing
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  ACE inhibitors. Differential use in elderly patients with hypertension.

Authors:  Z H Israili; W D Hall
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.