Literature DB >> 8512435

Evaluation of a portable prothrombin time monitor for home use by patients who require long-term oral anticoagulant therapy.

D R Anderson1, L Harrison, J Hirsh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The anticoagulant activity of warfarin sodium is monitored by the prothrombin time (PT). The introduction of a portable PT monitor has raised the possibility that patients could reduce the inconvenience of anticoagulant therapy by measuring their PT at home. We performed this study to determine the feasibility and accuracy of home use of the portable PT monitor.
METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed in consecutive eligible patients who required long-term anticoagulant therapy. Patients performed multiple measurements of their PT at home by means of the portable monitor and at their usual laboratory within a 4-hour interval. The accuracy of the portable monitor was evaluated by two criteria for agreement. Standard agreement was achieved if the portable monitor and laboratory results were both either within or outside the patient's targeted therapeutic range or if the two results were within 0.4 international normalized ratio units of each other. Expanded agreement was achieved if both the portable monitor and laboratory results were within +/- 0.4 international normalized ratio units of the targeted therapeutic range.
RESULTS: Forty patients (19 men and 21 women, aged 25 to 74 years) were followed up for 6 to 24 months by means of the portable PT monitor. The mean level of agreement achieved per patient was 83% (95% confidence interval, 79% to 87%) by the standard criteria and 96% (95% confidence interval, 94% to 98%) by the expanded criteria. Twenty-seven patients (68%) and 39 patients (98%) achieved more than 80% agreement by the standard and the expanded criteria, respectively. Questionnaire results revealed that 97% of the patients preferred using the portable monitor to measure their PT.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving long-term anticoagulant therapy achieved a high rate of clinically important agreement between self-measurements of the PT with the use of a portable monitor and laboratory PT results. Patients strongly preferred using the portable monitor to measure their PT levels. The use of the portable monitor as the primary method for measuring the PT can be recommended in selected patients receiving long-term anticoagulant treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8512435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  21 in total

Review 1.  Out-of-hospital coagulation monitoring and management.

Authors:  J E Ansell
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Systematic review of near patient test evaluations in primary care.

Authors:  B C Delaney; C J Hyde; R J McManus; S Wilson; D A Fitzmaurice; S Jowett; R Tobias; G H Thorpe; F D Hobbs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-25

Review 3.  The role of point-of-care anticoagulation monitoring in arterial and venous thromboembolic disorders.

Authors:  C R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Home monitoring and management of warfarin therapy: an anticoagulation clinic perspective.

Authors:  T L Stuart
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Recommendations for patients undertaking self management of oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  D A Fitzmaurice; S J Machin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-27

Review 6.  Anticoagulation in patients with thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  R C Tait
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  The cost-effectiveness of different management strategies for patients on chronic warfarin therapy.

Authors:  J E Lafata; S A Martin; S Kaatz; R E Ward
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Patient barriers and solutions for INR self-testing.

Authors:  Nancy L Shapiro
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 9.  Oral anticoagulation control: the European perspective.

Authors:  David A Fitzmaurice
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  A randomised controlled trial of patient self management of oral anticoagulation treatment compared with primary care management.

Authors:  D A Fitzmaurice; E T Murray; K M Gee; T F Allan; F D R Hobbs
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.