Literature DB >> 8512051

Biomechanical analysis of masticatory system configuration in Neandertals and Inuits.

M A Spencer1, B Demes.   

Abstract

Considerable debate has surrounded the adaptive significance of Neandertal craniofacial morphology. Numerous unique morphological features of this form have been interpreted as indicating an adaptation to intense anterior tooth use. Conversely, it has been argued that certain features related to muscle position imply a reduced mechanical advantage for producing bite forces on the incisors and canines. In this study, hypotheses about morphological specializations for anterior tooth use have been derived from a biomechanical model of Greaves (1978). These hypotheses were tested by performing separate pairwise comparisons of Neandertals and early Homo sapiens, and Inuits and Native Americans from Utah. Inuits are known to have produced repeated and high magnitude forces on their anterior dentition and therefore serve as a good model for a hominid adapted to intensive anterior tooth use. Biomechanically relevant dimensions of the masticatory system were measured using a computer-driven video analysis system and compared between the two taxa in each comparison. The results of this study reveal a number of similarities between the morphological specializations exhibited by Neandertals and Inuits that can be related to intensified anterior tooth use. The hypothesis that Neandertals were poorly designed for producing masticatory forces is rejected. Specializations that differ between the two groups are interpreted as being the result of differential functional demands placed on the postcanine dentition in Neandertals and Inuits. It is suggested that many of the unique morphological features of the Neandertal face are a response to intensified use of the anterior dentition and the need to retain a sufficiently large postcanine occlusal area necessary for a relatively high attrition diet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8512051     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330910102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  20 in total

Review 1.  Combining geometric morphometrics and functional simulation: an emerging toolkit for virtual functional analyses.

Authors:  Paul O'Higgins; Samuel N Cobb; Laura C Fitton; Flora Gröning; Roger Phillips; Jia Liu; Michael J Fagan
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Changes in human skull morphology across the agricultural transition are consistent with softer diets in preindustrial farming groups.

Authors:  David C Katz; Mark N Grote; Timothy D Weaver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Middle Pliocene hominin diversity: Australopithecus deyiremeda and Kenyanthropus platyops.

Authors:  Fred Spoor; Meave G Leakey; Paul O'Higgins
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Craniofacial levels and the morphological maturation of the human skull.

Authors:  Markus Bastir; Antonio Rosas; Paul O'higgins
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Exploring the biomechanics of taurodontism.

Authors:  Stefano Benazzi; Huynh N Nguyen; Ottmar Kullmer; Jean-Jacques Hublin
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 6.  A century of development.

Authors:  Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.868

7.  The role of the sutures in biomechanical dynamic simulation of a macaque cranial finite element model: implications for the evolution of craniofacial form.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Sarah A Wood; Ian R Grosse; Callum F Ross; Uriel Zapata; Craig D Byron; Barth W Wright; David S Strait
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  The effect of dietary adaption on cranial morphological integration in capuchins (order Primates, genus Cebus).

Authors:  Jana Makedonska; Barth W Wright; David S Strait
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Computer simulations show that Neanderthal facial morphology represents adaptation to cold and high energy demands, but not heavy biting.

Authors:  Stephen Wroe; William C H Parr; Justin A Ledogar; Jason Bourke; Samuel P Evans; Luca Fiorenza; Stefano Benazzi; Jean-Jacques Hublin; Chris Stringer; Ottmar Kullmer; Michael Curry; Todd C Rae; Todd R Yokley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Out of Africa: modern human origins special feature: the meaning of neandertal skeletal morphology.

Authors:  Timothy D Weaver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.