Literature DB >> 851140

Inhibition of premature labor: a multicenter comparison of ritodrine and ethanol.

N H Lauersen, I R Merkatz, N Tejani, K H Wilson, A Roberson, L I Mann, F Fuchs.   

Abstract

A randomized controlled study was carried out at three medical centers to compare the efficacy and side effects of ethanol and ritodrine in the treatment of threatened premature labor. One hundred and thirty-five patients judged to be between the twentieth and thirty-sixth week of gestation and presenting with clinical symptoms of premature labor were included. Sixty-seven patients were treated with intravenous infusion of 10 per cent ethanol. Sixty-eight patients were treated with intravenous infusion of ritodrine for 12 hours followed by oral ritodrine. If labor recurred prematurely, up to two additional courses of ethanol or ritodrine were given. Delivery was postponed for more than 72 hours in 49 of 67 patients (73 per cent) with ethanol and in 61 of 68 patients (90 per cent) with ritodrine; this difference was significant. Patients in the ethanol group gained a mean of 27.6 days while patients in the ritodrine group gained a mean of 44.0 days. Fifty-four per cent of the ethanol group and 72 per cent of the ritodrine group carried their infants to 36 weeks of gestation. Five infants in the ethanol group and one infant in the ritodrine group died from respiratory distress syndrome. The most frequent side effect of ethanol were nausea and vomiting. The most frequent side effects of ritodrine were tachycardia and blood pressure changes which were easily controlled by lowering the infusion rate. Ethanol and ritodrine were both found to be effective inhibitors of premature labor with ritodrine giving the most favorable results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 851140     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(77)90115-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  14 in total

1.  [Possibilities and limitations of tocolysis].

Authors:  E Saling
Journal:  Arch Gynecol       Date:  1979-07-20

Review 2.  Treatment of preterm labour. A review of the therapeutic options.

Authors:  S N Caritis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Drug treatment of premature labour.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-08-08

4.  Management of premature labour in diabetic pregnancy.

Authors:  A H Barnett; S M Stubbs; A M Mander
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 5.  Hormonal and local regulation of uterine activity during parturition: Part I--The oxytocin system.

Authors:  M Maggi; E Baldi; T Susini
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Development of tolerance to oral salbutamol in the third trimester of pregnancy: a study of circulatory and metabolic effects.

Authors:  J Wager; B B Fredholm; N O Lunell; B Persson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  A risk-benefit assessment of therapies for premature labour.

Authors:  K Higby; C R Suiter
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Acute alcohol consumption disrupts the hormonal milieu of lactating women.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; M Yanina Pepino; Karen L Teff
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-12-28       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 9.  Vaginal progesterone vs. cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix, previous preterm birth, and singleton gestation: a systematic review and indirect comparison metaanalysis.

Authors:  Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero; Kypros Nicolaides; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; John M O'Brien; Elcin Cetingoz; Eduardo da Fonseca; George Creasy; Priya Soma-Pillay; Shalini Fusey; Cetin Cam; Zarko Alfirevic; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Neonatal respiratory distress: potential for prevention.

Authors:  M J Lewins; J M Whitfield; G W Chance
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1979-05-05       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.