Literature DB >> 8511264

A 2-year clinical evaluation of two pit and fissure sealants placed with and without the use of a bonding agent.

L Boksman1, R J McConnell, B Carson, E F McCutcheon-Jones.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether the clinical effectiveness of pit and fissure sealant was increased (as demonstrated by an increased retention rate) when a bonding agent was used prior to the placement of the sealant. Two pit and fissure sealants, Concise Light Cured White Sealant and Prisma Shield Light Cured Sealant, were placed in vivo with and without the use of the bonding agents, Scotchbond 2 and Prisma Universal Bond. After 2 years, 55% of the sample was available for recall. The retention rates for the sealants were 77% for Concise with Scotchbond 2, 84% for Concise with no bonding agent, 77% for Prisma Shield with Universal Bond, and 77% for Prisma Shield with no bonding agent. Results of this study indicated that the use of a bonding agent prior to the application of a pit and fissure sealant does not increase the retention rate.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8511264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quintessence Int        ISSN: 0033-6572            Impact factor:   1.677


  15 in total

1.  Impact of the intermediary layer on sealant retention: a randomized 24-month clinical trial.

Authors:  Kelly Maria Silva Moreira; Kamila Rosamilia Kantovitz; Juliana Pedrini Dias Aguiar; Ana Flávia Sanches Borges; Fernanda Miori Pascon; Regina Maria Puppin-Rontani
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  A Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Bonding Agent on the Tensile Bond Strength of Two Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Invasive and Non-invasive Techniques: An in-vitro Study.

Authors:  Shamsher Singh; Vivek Adlakha; Prashant Babaji; Preetika Chandna; Abi M Thomas; Saroj Chopra
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-10-05

3.  Comparative evaluation of Shear bond strength of different Pit and fissure Sealants in Primary and Permanent teeth - An In-Vitro Study.

Authors:  H M Pushpalatha; K S Ravichandra; Koya Srikanth; G Divya; Vasanthi Done; K Bala Krishna; Vishwanath Patil
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-04-26

4.  Evaluation of Embrace WetBond and Helioseal-F sealant retention with and without a Self-etch adhesive: A 12 month follow-up.

Authors:  Gemimaa Mathew; Trophimus-Gnanabagyan Jayakaran; Hemalatha Ramkumar; Senthil Dakshinamoorthy; Shankar Paulindraraj; Nancy Solomon
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-12-01

5.  Comparison of the Success Rate of Filled and Unfilled Resin-Based Fissure Sealants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Elmira Bagheri; Alireza Sarraf Shirazi; Kiana Shekofteh
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2022-02-08

6.  Moisture-tolerant resin-based sealant: A boon.

Authors:  Prasanna Kumar Bhat; Sapna Konde; Sunil N Raj; Narayan Chandra Kumar
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2013-07

7.  Effects of sealant, viscosity, and bonding agents on microleakage of fissure sealants: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Maryam Mehrabkhani; Fatemeh Mazhari; Samaneh Sadeghi; Masoumeh Ebrahimi
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

Review 8.  Bonding agents in pit and fissure sealants: a review.

Authors:  Usha Mohan Das; Suma G
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2009-12-26

9.  Effect of Adhesive Application on Sealant Success: A Clinical Study of Fifth and Seventh Generation Adhesive Systems.

Authors:  Vaibhav Tandon; Ravishanakar Telgi Lingesha; Pradeep Shankar Tangade; Amit Tirth; Sumit Kumar Pal; Chaitra Telgi Lingesha; Vikram Arora; Vipul Yadav
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2015-10

10.  Effectiveness of fissure sealant retention and caries prevention with and without primer and bond.

Authors:  Huda Nazar; Ana Karina Mascarenhas; Sabiha Al-Mutwa; Jitendra Ariga; Pramod Soparker
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 1.927

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.