Literature DB >> 8510276

Predictability of recurrent and progressive disease in individual patients with primary superficial bladder cancer.

L A Kiemeney1, J A Witjes, R P Heijbroek, A L Verbeek, F M Debruyne.   

Abstract

The ultimate goal of prognostic assessment is optimization of individual counseling. Often, however, studies on prognostic factors focus on discriminating between high risk and low risk subgroups without considering the relevance of 1 or more factors for predicting disease outcome in individual patients. We quantified the accuracy of prediction of future recurrences and disease progression in individual patients with primary superficial bladder cancer. The study cohort consisted of 1,674 patients who were followed prospectively between 1983 and 1991 in the Netherlands. By analyzing half of the patients with proportional hazards regression, we computed relative risks of recurrence and progression. A prognostic index score based on these relative risks was then applied to the other half of the patients to determine whether group outcome could be predicted accurately. To assess the accuracy of prediction in individuals we used a method similar to the construction of receiver operating characteristic curves in diagnostic test assessment. The 3-year risk of first recurrence was 55% (95% confidence interval 51 to 59%). The 3-year risk of first progressive disease was 10% (95% confidence interval 8 to 12%). For the risk of first recurrence, tumor stage, tumor extent and multicentricity had statistically significant prognostic ability. Prognostic factors for the risk of disease progression were tumor stage, grade, multicentricity and the result of random biopsies from cystoscopically normal-appearing urothelium. For patients with a prognostic index score that suggested a low risk for recurrent and progressive disease the predicted 3-year risk of first recurrence was still 44% but the predicted 3-year risk of progression was only 3%. For patients with a prognostic index score that suggested a high risk the predicted risks were 74% and 22%, respectively. These predicted risks appeared to be fairly accurate when applied to the other half of our case series. However, in any 2 patients chosen at random the chance that the patient with the worst predicted prognosis would have a shorter recurrence-free and progression-free followup was calculated to be only 58% and 67%, respectively. Although the available prognostic factors in superficial bladder cancer may be useful to identify high risk and low risk subgroups, predictability in individuals is highly inaccurate. More relevant prognostic factors are needed to decrease current overtreatment and undertreatment rates, and to improve the followup policy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8510276     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35397-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  27 in total

1.  Low-Grade, Multiple, Ta Non-muscle-Invasive Bladder Tumors: Tumor Recurrence and Worsening Progression.

Authors:  R B Nerli; Shridhar C Ghagane; K Shankar; Adarsh C Sanikop; Murigendra B Hiremath; Neeraj S Dixit; Laxman Magadum
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-01-29

Review 2.  Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: definition, treatment and future efforts.

Authors:  Sandip M Prasad; G Joel Decastro; Gary D Steinberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Targeted therapies in bladder cancer: an overview of in vivo research.

Authors:  Kim E M van Kessel; Tahlita C M Zuiverloon; Arnout R Alberts; Joost L Boormans; Ellen C Zwarthoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Telomerase activity detected by quantitative assay in bladder carcinoma and exfoliated cells in urine.

Authors:  R Fedriga; R Gunelli; O Nanni; F Bacci; D Amadori; D Calistri
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.715

5.  P27(Kip1) and Ki-67 expression analysis in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Bartosz Dybowski; Jolanta Kupryjańczyk; Alina Rembiszewska; Roman Pykało; Andrzej Borkowski
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2003-09-27

Review 6.  Bladder tumor markers: need, nature and application. 1. Nucleus-based markers.

Authors:  M M Kirollos; S McDermott; R A Bradbrook
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1998

7.  Clinical impact of bladder biopsies with TUR-BT according to cytology results in patients with bladder cancer: a case control study.

Authors:  Masashi Matsushima; Eiji Kikuchi; Masanori Hasegawa; Kazuhiro Matsumoto; Akira Miyajima; Mototsugu Oya
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Superficial bladder cancer: an update on etiology, molecular development, classification, and natural history.

Authors:  Erik Pasin; David Y Josephson; Anirban P Mitra; Richard J Cote; John P Stein
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

Review 9.  The health economics of bladder cancer: a comprehensive review of the published literature.

Authors:  Marc F Botteman; Chris L Pashos; Alberto Redaelli; Benjamin Laskin; Robert Hauser
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Histological classification and stage of newly diagnosed bladder cancer in a population-based study from the Northeastern United States.

Authors:  Alan R Schned; Angeline S Andrew; Carmen J Marsit; Karl T Kelsey; Michael S Zens; Margaret R Karagas
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.