Literature DB >> 8509102

Further studies of psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces.

V M Ciriello1, S H Snook, G J Hughes.   

Abstract

The effects of lifting boxes without handles, pulling long distances, carrying different size boxes, combining three handling tasks, and lifting with extended horizontal reach were studied using a psychophysical methodology. Six male industrial workers performed 42 variations of lifting, lowering, pushing, pulling, and carrying tasks. Lifting boxes without handles produced consistent decreases (median, 16%) in maximum acceptable weights when compared with lifting boxes with handles. Lifting with extended horizontal reach (approximately 48 cm) produced consistent decreases (median, 48%) in maximum acceptable weights when compared with lifting close to the body (approximately 17 cm). No significant heart rate or oxygen consumption differences occurred in either of these variables. No significant differences in maximum acceptable weight of carry were observed among box sizes; however, the maximum acceptable force of pulling was lower for longer (15.2 m) pulling tasks. The maximum acceptable weight for combination tasks was similar to that of the limiting component.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8509102     DOI: 10.1177/001872089303500110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  9 in total

1.  Gender differences in psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces for industrial workers observed after twenty years.

Authors:  Vincent M Ciriello; Rammohan V Maikala; Patrick G Dempsey; Niall V O'Brien
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Effect of systematic ergonomic hazard identification and control implementation on musculoskeletal disorder and injury risk.

Authors:  Linda F Cantley; Oyebode A Taiwo; Deron Galusha; Russell Barbour; Martin D Slade; Baylah Tessier-Sherman; Mark R Cullen
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 5.024

3.  Psychophysical basis for maximum pushing and pulling forces: A review and recommendations.

Authors:  Arun Garg; Thomas Waters; Jay Kapellusch; Waldemar Karwowski
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.656

4.  Effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in Iran.

Authors:  Ali Salehi Sahl Abadi; Adel Mazlomi; Gebraeil Nasl Saraji; Hojjat Zeraati; Mohammad Reza Hadian; Amir Homayoun Jafari
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2015-10-19

5.  Effects of Lifting Method, Safety Shoe Type, and Lifting Frequency on Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift, Physiological Responses, and Safety Shoes Discomfort Rating.

Authors:  Fares F Alferdaws; Mohamed Z Ramadan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Changes in Back Compressive Force When Measuring Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift in Iranian Male Students.

Authors:  Ali Salehi Sahl Abadi; Gebraeil Nasl Saraji; Adel Mazloumi; Hojjat Zeraati; Mohammad Reza Hadian; Amir Homayoun Jafari
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.429

7.  Psychophysically determining the maximum acceptable weight of lift for polypropylene laminated bags.

Authors:  Yi-Lang Chen; Ting-Kuang Ho
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 2.179

8.  The Impact of Heavy Load Carrying on Musculoskeletal Pain and Disability Among Women in Shinyanga Region, Tanzania.

Authors:  Jillian L Kadota; Sandra I McCoy; Michael N Bates; Agatha Mnyippembe; Prosper F Njau; Ndola Prata; Carisa Harris-Adamson
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.462

9.  Effect of Ambient Oxygen Content, Safety Shoe Type, and Lifting Frequency on Subject's MAWL and Physiological Responses.

Authors:  Atef M Ghaleb; Mohamed Z Ramadan; Ahmed Badwelan; Khalid Saad Aljaloud
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.