Literature DB >> 850663

Clinical fetal monitoring: its effect on cesarean section rate and perinatal mortality: five-year trends.

R H Paul, J R Huey, C F Yaeger.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1977        PMID： 850663     DOI： 10.1080/00325481.1977.11714552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med        ISSN： 0032-5481            Impact factor:   3.840


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  The electronic fetal monitor: should every mother have one?

Authors:  A S Dixon
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Association of electronic fetal monitoring during labor with cesarean section rate and with neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  J McCusker; D R Harris; D W Hosmer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Cesarean section: what is an acceptable rate?

Authors:  T F Baskett
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1978-05-06       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Trends in cesarean section rates for the United States, 1970--78.

Authors:  P J Placek; S M Taffel
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1980 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Policies toward medical technology: the case of electronic fetal monitoring.

Authors:  H D Banta; S B Thacker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Electronic fetal monitoring in relation to cesarean section delivery, for live births and stillbirths in the U.S., 1980.

Authors:  P J Placek; K G Keppel; S M Taffel; T L Liss
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.