Literature DB >> 8505603

Prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence in ambulatory adults: an UPRNet study.

E A Lagace1, W Hansen, J M Hickner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although urinary incontinence (UI) is a common and costly problem, its prevalence and severity in ambulatory patients is not well established. The main objectives of this study were to define the prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence in adult men and women who came to a primary care office for health care, to determine if these patients had ever told a health care provider about this problem, and to determine if they would be interested in treatment if it were available and effective.
METHODS: Men and women aged 20 years and over who came to family physicians' offices seeking health care for any reason during an 11-week period were the subjects of a survey by an anonymous questionnaire. Five family practice offices in UPRNet (the Upper Peninsula Research Network), a research network in Michigan, participated. We defined "current urinary incontinence" as any degree of incontinence in the past 12 months.
RESULTS: Of the 2830 study participants, 33% had current urinary incontinence (95% confidence interval [CI] 31% to 35%). Incontinence was experienced by 11% of the men and 43% of the women. Urinary incontinence constituting a social or hygienic problem was reported by 5% of the men and 23% of the women (17% overall). Of those with current UI, 72% had not told a health care provider. Of the patients who had not told a physician, 37% said they would seek care if they knew tests and effective treatment were available.
CONCLUSIONS: Urinary incontinence is a common problem among those seen in primary care settings, and its presence is often not known to the health care provider.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8505603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  11 in total

1.  Behavioral intervention versus pharmacotherapy or their combinations in the management of overactive bladder dysfunction.

Authors:  Khanh Tran; Robert M Levin; Shaker A Mousa
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2009-12-15

2.  Knowledge and understanding of urinary incontinence: survey of family practitioners in northern Alberta.

Authors:  Katherina Nguyen; Kathleen F Hunter; Adrian Wagg
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  A health related quality of life measure for use in patients with urge urinary incontinence: a validation study.

Authors:  D P Lubeck; L A Prebil; P Peeples; J S Brown
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Urinary incontinence in Canada. National survey of family physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices.

Authors:  J Graham Swanson; Jennifer Skelly; Brian Hutchison; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Pharmacological management of overactive bladder : a systematic and critical review of published economic evaluations.

Authors:  Denis Getsios; Wissam El-Hadi; Ingrid Caro; J Jaime Caro
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Does urinary incontinence affect quality of life of Greek women less severely? A cross-sectional study in two Mediterranean settings.

Authors:  Stella Anifantaki; Tuncay Muge Filiz; Athanasios Alegakis; Pinar Topsever; Adelais Markaki; Nursan Dede Cinar; Frangiskos Sofras; Christos Lionis
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Changes in self-assessment of continence status between telephone survey and subsequent clinical visit.

Authors:  A Thomas; L Kane Low; J A Tumbarello; J M Miller; D E Fenner; J O L DeLancey
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.696

8.  Male urinary incontinence: prevalence, risk factors, and preventive interventions.

Authors:  Tatyana A Shamliyan; Jean F Wyman; Ryan Ping; Timothy J Wilt; Robert L Kane
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2009

9.  Urinary incontinence in primary care: a comparison of older African-American and Caucasian women.

Authors:  Karen D Novielli; Zachary Simpson; Ginger Hua; James J Diamond; Carmen Sultana; Nina Paynter
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Evaluation and outcome measures in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence: International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) guidelines for research and clinical practice.

Authors:  G Ghoniem; E Stanford; K Kenton; C Achtari; R Goldberg; T Mascarenhas; M Parekh; K Tamussino; S Tosson; G Lose; E Petri
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.