Literature DB >> 8504425

Therapeutic efficacy of the topoisomerase I inhibitor 7-ethyl-10-(4-[1-piperidino]-1-piperidino)-carbonyloxy-camptothecin against human tumor xenografts: lack of cross-resistance in vivo in tumors with acquired resistance to the topoisomerase I inhibitor 9-dimethylaminomethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin.

P J Houghton1, P J Cheshire, J C Hallman, M C Bissery, A Mathieu-Boué, J A Houghton.   

Abstract

The efficacy of the topoisomerase I inhibitor CPT-11 [7-ethyl-10-(4-[1-piperidino]-1-piperidino)-carbonyloxycamptothec in] has been evaluated against a panel of human tumor xenografts derived from adult and pediatric malignancies. Tumors included eight colon adenocarcinomas representing intrinsically chemorefractory malignancies, six lines derived from childhood rhabdomyosarcoma (three embryonal and three alveolar) representing a chemoresponsive histiotype, and sublines of rhabdomyosarcomas selected in vivo for resistance to vincristine, melphalan, and the topoisomerase I inhibitor 9-dimethylaminomethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (topotecan). CPT-11 was given by i.v. administration daily for 5 days each week for 2 weeks (one cycle of therapy) or on the same schedule with cycles repeated every 21 days. The maximum tolerated dose for a single cycle of treatment was 40 mg/kg/dose, and for 3 cycles the maximum tolerated dose was 10 mg/kg/dose. Treatment was started against advanced tumors. Against colon adenocarcinomas CPT-11 administered for one cycle at the maximum tolerated dose caused complete or partial regression (> or = 50% reduction in tumor volume) in 5 of 8 lines. One cycle of CPT-11 therapy caused significant inhibition of tumor growth, without 50% regression, in 2 of 3 other colon adenocarcinomas. Rhabdomyosarcoma xenografts derived from untreated patients were highly responsive to CPT-11, which caused complete regression in 5 of 6 lines even at 20 or 10 mg/kg/dose. CPT-11 retained complete activity against rhabdomyosarcomas selected for resistance to vincristine and caused complete regressions in a line selected for resistance to melphalan that was also completely cross-resistant to topotecan. Of note was the observation that CPT-11 was as active against two xenografts selected for primary resistance to topotecan as it was against the respective parental tumors. Preliminary data indicate that CPT-11, like the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan, may have increased therapeutic efficacy when administered at a low dose for protracted periods (3 cycles). A comparison of the efficacy of CPT-11 with topotecan is presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8504425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  37 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan.

Authors:  G G Chabot
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Challenges and Opportunities for Childhood Cancer Drug Development.

Authors:  Peter J Houghton; Raushan T Kurmasheva
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 25.468

3.  Potential oral delivery of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxy-camptothecin (SN-38) using poly(amidoamine) dendrimers.

Authors:  Rohit B Kolhatkar; Peter Swaan; Hamidreza Ghandehari
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  Pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  M Boyd Gillespie; David T Marshall; Terry A Day; Allen O Mitchell; David R White; Julio C Barredo
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2006-01

Review 5.  Phase I trials in paediatric oncology--the European perspective. The New Agents Group of the United Kingdom Childrens Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  E J Estlin; S Ablett; D R Newell; I J Lewis; L Lashford; A D Pearson
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.850

6.  Genetic predisposition to the metabolism of irinotecan (CPT-11). Role of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase isoform 1A1 in the glucuronidation of its active metabolite (SN-38) in human liver microsomes.

Authors:  L Iyer; C D King; P F Whitington; M D Green; S K Roy; T R Tephly; B L Coffman; M J Ratain
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1998-02-15       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Phase I trial of oral irinotecan and temozolomide for children with relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma: a new approach to neuroblastoma therapy consortium study.

Authors:  Lars M Wagner; Judith G Villablanca; Clinton F Stewart; Kristine R Crews; Susan Groshen; C Patrick Reynolds; Julie R Park; John M Maris; Randall A Hawkins; Heike E Daldrup-Link; Hollie A Jackson; Katherine K Matthay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Children's Oncology Group's 2013 blueprint for research: Soft tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  Douglas S Hawkins; Sheri L Spunt; Stephen X Skapek
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.167

9.  Vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide compared with vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide alternating with vincristine, topotecan, and cyclophosphamide for intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: children's oncology group study D9803.

Authors:  Carola A S Arndt; Julie A Stoner; Douglas S Hawkins; David A Rodeberg; Andrea A Hayes-Jordan; Charles N Paidas; David M Parham; Lisa A Teot; Moody D Wharam; John C Breneman; Sarah S Donaldson; James R Anderson; William H Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Limited sampling models for simultaneous estimation of the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its active metabolite SN-38.

Authors:  G G Chabot
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.