Literature DB >> 8503724

Wristband identification error reporting in 712 hospitals. A College of American Pathologists' Q-Probes study of quality issues in transfusion practice.

S W Renner1, P J Howanitz, P Bachner.   

Abstract

The correct wristband identification of patients is essential to prevent acute, hemolytic transfusion reactions from incompatible transfusion. We compared wristband identification errors for 712 hospitals. Phlebotomists checked patient wristbands on 2,463,727 occasions, finding 67,289 errors; in 33,308 instances, patient wristbands were missing entirely. The median total error rate was 2.2%; 10% of participants had error rates of 10.9% or greater. Absent wristbands represented 49.5% of errors; multiple wristbands with different information, 8.3%; wristbands with incomplete data, 7.5%; erroneous data, 8.6%; illegible data, 5.7%; and patients wearing wristbands with another patient's identifying information, 0.5%. The monitoring for errors by phlebotomy staff was the most important policy associated with lower error rates. Initial placement of wristbands by nursing staff was the only policy associated with increased error rates. We conclude that wristband identification error rates depend on differences in hospital policy and procedure and should be responsive to quality improvement efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8503724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  7 in total

1.  Improving patient safety by identifying side effects from introducing bar coding in medication administration.

Authors:  Emily S Patterson; Richard I Cook; Marta L Render
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Effectiveness of barcoding for reducing patient specimen and laboratory testing identification errors: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Susan R Snyder; Alessandra M Favoretto; James H Derzon; Robert H Christenson; Stephen E Kahn; Colleen S Shaw; Rich Ann Baetz; Diana Mass; Corinne R Fantz; Stephen S Raab; Milenko J Tanasijevic; Edward B Liebow
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.281

Review 3.  Systems for monitoring transfusion risk.

Authors:  Oswald Prinoth
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 4.  Blood bank audit.

Authors:  P H Pinkerton
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Acceptability of identification bracelets for hospital inpatients.

Authors:  A Cleopas; V Kolly; P A Bovier; P Garnerin; T V Perneger
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10

6.  The nature and occurrence of registration errors in the emergency department.

Authors:  A Forogh Hakimzada; Robert A Green; Osman R Sayan; Jiajie Zhang; Vimla L Patel
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 4.046

7.  The practice of venous blood collection among laboratory and non-laboratory professionals working in Ethiopian Government Hospitals: a comparative study.

Authors:  Mulugeta Melkie; Abel Girma; Tsegaye Tsalla
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.